DOI: https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.21.1.5153

Motivos de uso de las redes sociales virtuales: Análisis de perfiles de mujeres rurales


Resumen


En el presente trabajo, se muestran los resultados de una investigación cuyo objetivo es conocer los motivos de uso de las redes sociales virtuales de las mujeres rurales y determinar perfiles en función de sus respuestas. Para ello, se realiza un estudio de encuesta, cuyo cuestionario se aplica a 478 mujeres de entornos rurales de Andalucía de 18 a 65 años. Los resultados muestran dos perfiles de mujeres en función de sus motivaciones de uso de las redes, encontrando que las que usan las redes con una mayor variedad de motivos, muestran mayores niveles en intensidad, habilidad y autonomía de uso, mientras que las que la usan exclusivamente por motivos relacionales presentan niveles inferiores en estas variables. Esto sugiere que los motivos de uso es una variable explicativa de la inclusión digital de las mujeres rurales en las redes sociales. Los resultados permiten repensar las propuestas educativas de alfabetización digital

Palabras clave


Redes sociales, mujer rural, inclusión digital, estudios de las mujeres, capital social, motivos de uso, alfabetización digital, aprendizaje permanente

Texto completo:

PDF PDF (English)

Referencias


  • Area, M. & Pessoa, T. (2012). De lo sólido a lo líquido: Las nuevas alfabetizaciones ante los cambios culturales de la Web 2.0. Comunicar, XIX, 38, 13-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/C38-2011-02-01

  • Arteaga, R., Cortijo, V. & Javed, U. (2014). Students' perceptions of Facebook for academic purposes. Computers & Education, 70, 138–149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.012

  • Attwell, G. (2007). Personal Learning Environments. The future of e-learning? eLearning Papers, 2(1) Recuperado de http://www.elearningeuropa.info/files/media/media11561.pdf

  • Brandtzæga P.B., Heim, J. & Karahasanovic, A. (2011). Understanding the new digital divide. A typology of Internet users in Europe. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 69(3), 123-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.11.004

  • Braun, M. T. (2013). Obstacles to social networking website use among older adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 673–680. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.004

  • Carpenter, J. M., Green, M. C. & LaFlam, J. (2011). People or profiles: Individual differences in online social networking use. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(5), 538-541. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.11.006

  • Casta-o, C. (2009). La segunda brecha digital y las mujeres jóvenes. Quaderns de la Mediterrània, 11, 218-224. Recuperado de http://www.iemed.org/publicacions/quaderns/11/41_la_segunda_brecha_digital.pdf

  • Chen, L.Y, Hsiao, B., Chern, C.C. & Chen, H.G. (2014). Affective mechanisms linking Internet use to learning performance in high school students: A moderated mediation study. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 431–443. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.025

  • Cheung, C. M. K., Chiu, P.Y. & Lee, M. K. O. (2011). Online social networks: Why do students use facebook? Computers in Human Behavior, 27(4), 1337-1343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.028

  • Clipson, T., Wilson, S. A. & DuFrene, D. D. (2010). The social networking arena: battle of the sexes. Business Communication Quarterly, 75 (1), 1-5.

  • Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., & Leu, D. J. (Eds). (2008). Handbook of research in new literacies. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Correa, T. (2010). The Participation Divide Among ''Online Experts'': Experience, Skills and Psychological Factors as Predictors of College Students' Web Content Creation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16, 71–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01532.x

  • Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002

  • Dias, I. (2012). O uso das tecnologías digitais entre os seniores. Motivações e intereses. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 68, 51-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.7458/SPP201268693

  • DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Celeste, C., & Shafer, S. (2004). Digital Inequality: From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use. In K. Neckerman (Ed.), Social Inequality (355-400). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

  • Dogruer, N., Menevis, I. & Eyyam, R. (2011). What is the motivation for using Facebook?. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2642–2646. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.162

  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C. & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook ''friends:" Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168.

  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x

  • Falk, I. & Kilpatrick, S. (2000). What is social capital? A study of interaction in a rural community. Sociologia Ruralis, 40 (1), 87-110.

  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00133

  • Freese, J., Rivas, S. & Hargittai, E. (2006). Cognitive ability and Internet use among older adults. Poetics, 34, 236-249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.008

  • García, A., López-de-Ayala, M.C. & Catalina, B. (2013). Hábitos de uso en Internet y en las redes sociales de los adolescentes españoles. Comunicar, XXI (41), 195-204.

  • Gómez, M., Roses, S. & Farias, P. (2012). El uso académico de las redes sociales en universitarios. Comunicar, XIX(38), 131-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/C38-2011-03-04

  • Godfrey, M. & Johnson, O. (2009). Digital circles of support: Meeting the information needs of older people. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 633–642.

  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.016

  • Greenhow, C. & Burton, L. (2011). Help from my "Friends:" Social capital in the social network sites of low-income high school students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45(2), 223-245.

  • http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/EC.45.2.f

  • Greenhow, C. & Robelia, E. (2009). Informal learning and identity formation in online social networks. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 119-140.

  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439880902923580

  • Hargittai, E. & Hinnant, A. (2008). Digital Inequality: Differences in Young Adults' Use of the Internet. Communication Research, 35(5), 602-621. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0093650208321782

  • Hargittai, E. & Hsieh, Y.P. (2010).Predictors and consequences of differentiated practices on social network sites.Information, Communication & Society, 13(4), 515-536. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691181003639866

  • Hargittai, E. & Walejko, G. (2008). The participation divide: Content creation and sharing in the digital age. Information, Communication & Society, 11 (2), 239-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691180801946150

  • Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: differences in people's online skills. First Monday, 7 (4), 1-15 http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v7i4.942

  • Hargittai, E. (2008). Whose Space? Differences Among Users and Non-Users of Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 276–297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00396.x

  • Hargittai, E. (2010). Digital Natives? Variation in Internet Skills and Uses among Members of the ''Net Generation''. Sociological Inquiry, 80 (1), 92–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x

  • Hew, K.F. & Cheung, W.S. (2012). Students' use of asynchronous voice discussion in a blended-learning environment: A study of two undergraduate classes. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 10(4) 360-367.

  • Hsieh, Y.P. (2012). Online social networking skills: The social affordances approach to digital inequality. First Monday, 17 (4), 1-12.http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v17i4.3893

  • Imhof, M., Vollmeyer, R. & Beierlein, C. (2007). Computer use and the gender gap: The issue of access, use, motivation, and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(6), 2823-2837.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.007

  • Jackson, L. A., Ervin, K. S., Gardner, P. D., & Schmitt, N. (2001). Gender and the Internet: Women communicating and men searching. Sex Roles, 44(5/6), 363-379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010937901821

  • Joinson, N. A. (2008). Looking at', 'Looking up' or 'Keeping up with' People? Motives and uses of Facebook. CHI 2008 Proceedings: 1027-1036.

  • Kwon, M.W. D'Angelo & McLeod, J. D.M. (2013). Facebook use and social capital: To bond, to bridge, or to escape. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 33(5-6). http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0270467613496767

  • LaRose, R., Greggb, J.L., Stroverc, S., Straubhaarc, J. & Carpenterd, S. (2007) Closing the rural broadband gap: Promoting adoption of the Internet in rural America. Telecommunications Policy, 31, 359–373. DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.-2007.04.004

  • Ley 45/2007, de 13 de diciembre, para el desarrollo sostenible del medio rural. Boletín Oficial del Estado, 299, de 15 de diciembre de 2007.

  • Lin, C., Tang, W. & Kuo, F. (2012). Mommy Wants to Learn the Computer: How Middle-Aged and Elderly Women in Taiwan Learn ICT Through Social Support. Adult Education Quarterly, 62 (1), 73-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741713610392760

  • Lin, K.Y. & Lu, H.P. (2011). Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1152-1161.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.009

  • Livingstone, S. & Helsper, E. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9(4), 671- 696. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444807080335

  • Livingstone, S. & Helsper, E. (2010).Balancing opportunities and risks in teenagers' use of the internet: the role of online skills and internet self-efficacy. .New media & society, 12 (2), 309-329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342697

  • Livingstone, S., Van Couvering, E. & Thumim, N. (2008). Converging traditions of research on media and information literacies: disciplinary, critical, and methodological issues. En J. Coiro, M., Knobel, C. Lankshear & D. J. Leu, (Eds.) Handbook of research on new literacies. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Martinez-Pecino, R., Delerue, A. & Silva, P. (2013.). Portuguese older people and the Internet: Interaction, uses, motivations, and obstacles. Communications - The European Journal of Communication Research, 38(4), 331-346. DOI: 10.1515/commun-2013-0020

  • Mazman S.G. & Usluel, Y. K. (2011). Gender differences in using social networks. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10 (2), 133-139. Recuperado de http://goo.gl/8o42eT

  • Meyers, E.M., Erickson, I. & Small, R.V. (2013). Digital literacy and informal learning environments: an introduction, Learning, Media and Technology, 38(4), 355-367, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.783597

  • Nadkarni, A. & Hofmann, S. (2011). Why do people use Facebook? Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 243–249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.007

  • Notley, T. (2009). Young People, Online Networks, and Social Inclusion. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 1208–1227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01487.x

  • Notley, T.M. & Foth, M. (2008). Extending Australia's digital divide policy: an examination of the value of social inclusion and social capital policy frameworks. Australian Social Policy, 7, 1-24.

  • Novo-Corti, I., Varela-Candamio, L. & García-Álvarez, T. (2014). Breaking the walls of social exclusion of women rural by means of ICTs: The case of "digital divides" in Galician. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 497–507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.017

  • Papacharissi, Z. & Mendelson, A. (2011). Toward a new(er) sociability: uses, gratifications and social capital on Facebook. En S. Papathanassopoulos (Ed.), Media Perspectives for the 21st Century. New York: Routledge (pp. 212-230).

  • Pfeil, U., Arjan, R. & Zaphiris, P. (2009). Age differences in online social networking. A study of user profiles and the social capital divide among teenagers and older users in MySpace. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(3), 643-654. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.015

  • Rebollo-Catalán, A. & Vico, A. (2014). El apoyo social percibido como factor de la inclusión digital de las mujeres de entorno rural en las redes sociales virtuales. Comunicar, 43, 173-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/C43-2014-17

  • Rubio, M. J. y Escofet, A. (2013). Estudio sobre los usos de las TIC y el empoderamiento de las mujeres. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 62(3), 1-13.

  • Seidman, G. (2013). Self-presentation and belonging on Facebook: How personality influences social media use and motivations. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 402–407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.009

  • Selwyn, N. & Facer, K. (2007). Beyond the digital divide: Rethinking digital inclusion for the 21st century. Futurelab: Bristol.

  • Sloep, P. & Berlanga, A. (2011). Redes de aprendizaje, aprendizaje en red. Comunicar, XIX(37), 55-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/C37-2011-02-05

  • Smoke, A.D., Ellison, N.B., Lampe, C. & Wohn, D.Y. (2011). Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2322–2329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.011

  • Staksrud, E., Ólafsson, K. & Livingstone, S. (2013). Does the use of social networking sites increase children's risk of harm? Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 40–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.026

  • Steinfield, C., Ellison, N. B. & Lampe, C. (2008). Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 434-445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.002

  • Subrahmanyam, K., Reich, S.M., Waechter, N., Espinoza, G. (2008). Online and offline social networks: Use of social networking sites by emerging adults. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 420-433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.003

  • Tosun, L.P. (2012). Motives for Facebook use and expressing ''true self'' on the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1510–1517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.018

  • Valenzuela, S., Park, N. & Kee, K. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students' life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 875–901. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01474.x

  • vanDeursen, A.J. & van Dijk, J.A. (2013). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New media & society, 0(0) 1–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487959

  • vanDijk, J.A. (2006). Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics, 34, 221–235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.004

  • vanDijk, J.A. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

  • Verges, N. (2012). De la exclusión a la autoinclusión de las mujeres en las TIC. Motivaciones, posibilitadores y mecanismos de autoinclusión. Athenea Digital, 12 (3), 129-150.

  • Vergés, N., Hache, A. & Cruells, E. (2011). Indagando en la relevancia de internet en el acceso, uso y deseos de las TIC por parte de las mujeres en las TIC. TESI, 12 (2), 105-121.

  • Yang, C.C & Brown, B. (2013). Motives for using facebook, patterns of Facebook activities, and late adolescents. Social adjustment to college. Youth Adolescence, 42, 403–416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9836-x

  • Zillien, N & Hargittai, E. (2009). Digital distinction: status-specific Internet uses. Social ScienceQuarterly, 90(2), 274–291.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00617.x


Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.






https://ojs.uv.es/public/site/images/aliaga/scopus_170  https://ojs.uv.es/public/site/images/aliaga/esci_225