La concepción de Henri Lefebvre de naturaleza-sociedad en el proyecto revolucionario de la autogestión
Resumen
El intrincado enfoque materialista dialéctico de Henri Lefebvre sobre la problemática naturaleza-sociedad, junto con su defensa de una praxis orientada a la transformación total desde la base a través de la autogestión, ofrece un enfoque unificado, crítico y dialéctico de la ecología política. Desgraciadamente, su trabajo en estas áreas se ha interpretado con demasiada frecuencia como dividido y fragmentario, lo que ha escindido su análisis radical de la producción del espacio-tiempo de su praxis crítica relacionada con la autogestión. Para ofrecer un correctivo a esto, elaboramos brevemente su uso del enfoque materialista dialéctico de Marx esbozando cómo Lefebvre lleva este método a la problemática naturaleza-sociedad, y cómo su teorización de la autogestión apunta a una praxis radical dirigida a superar las contradicciones socio-ecológicas del capital. Su compromiso con la teoría de la fractura metabólica de Marx, así como su defensa de un proyecto radical de autogestión como parte de la crítica de la vida cotidiana, sirven para situar la cuestión subyacente de la enajenación en términos espaciales y ofrecen a la geografía una perspectiva transformadora que evita plantear sistemas cerrados e intentar agotar los diversos significados asignados a la naturaleza. Con ello, Lefebvre demuestra cómo la problemática naturaleza-sociedad desborda las cuestiones tanto de encuadre ontológico como de lenguaje y reclama una unidad de teoría y práctica radicales para superar las separaciones.
Palabras clave
Texto completo:
texto rescatado PDFReferencias
Barkin, David y Sánchez, Alejandra. “The communitarian revolutionary subject”. Third World Quarterly 41:8 (2019): 1-23.
Barrows, Harlan H. “Geography as Human Ecology”. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 13:1 (1923): 1–14.
Bennett, Jane (2010). Vibrant Matter. Durham: Duke University.
Bernal, John Desmond (1934). Dialectical materialism”. Levy, H. et al. (ed.). Aspects of Dialectical Materialism. Londres: Watts and Co.: 89-146.
Brenner, Neal (2008). “Henri Lefebvre’s critique of state productivism”. Goonewardena, Kanishka; Kipfer, Stefan; Milgrom, Richard; y Schmid, Christian (eds.). Space, Difference, Everyday Life. Nueva York: Routledge: 231–249.
Brenner, Neil y Elden, Stuart (2009). “Introduction”. Lefebvre, Henri. State, Space, World. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota: 1-48.
Burgess, Rod. “The concept of nature in geography and Marxism”. Antipode 17:2–3 (1985): 68–78.
Castree, Noel (2015). “Capitalism and the Marxist critique of political ecology”. Perreault, Tom; Bridge, Gavin; y McCarthy, James (eds.). Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology. Oxon: Routledge: 279–292.
Ehrlich, Paul R. y Ehrlich, Anne H. (2004). One with Nineveh. Washington D.C.: Island Press.
Elden, Stuart. “Politics, philosophy, geography”. Antipode 33:5 (2001): 809–825.
Elden, Stuart (2004). Understanding Henri Lefebvre. Nueva York: Continuum.
Elden, Stuart. “There is a politics of space because space is political”. Radical Philosophy Review 10:2 (2007): 101–116.
Escobar, Arturo (2010). “Postconstructivist political ecologies”. Redclift, Michael R. y Woodgate, Graham (eds.). International Handbook of Environmental Sociology. Cheltenham: Elgar: 91–105.
Foster, John Bellamy. “Marx’s theory of metabolic rift”. American Journal of Sociology 105:2 (1999): 366-405.
Foster, John Bellamy (2017). “Third nature”. Prashad, Vijay (ed.). Will the Flower Slip through the Asphalt? Delhi: Left Word: 50−57.
Foster, John Bellamy. “Marx’s open-ended critique”. Monthly Review 70:1 (2018): 1-16.
Foster, John Bellamy (2020). The Return of Nature. Nueva York: Monthly Review Press.
Foster, John Bellamy y Clark, Brett (2020). The Robbery of Nature. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Foster, John Bellamy y Suwandi, Intan. “COVID-19 and catastrophe capitalism”. Monthly Review 72:2 (2020): 1−20.
Foster, John Bellamy; Napoletano, Brian M.; Clark, Brett; y Urquijo, Pedro S. “Henri Lefebvre’s Marxian ecological critique”. Environmental Sociology 6:1 (2019): 31–41.
Fracchia, Joseph y Ryan, Cheyney (1992) “Historical materialist science, crisis, and commitment”. Bonefeld, Werner; Gunn, Richard y Psychopedis, Kosmas (eds.). Open Marxism, vol. 2. Londres: Pluto: 46-68.
Goonewardena, Kanishka (2011a). “Henri Lefebvre”. Ritzer, George y Stepnisky, Jeffrey (eds.). Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Major Social Theorists. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell: 44–64.
Goonewardena, Kanishka. “Henri Lefebvre y la revolución de la vida cotidiana, la ciudad y el Estado”. Urban 5:2 (2011b): 25–39.
Gregory Derek; Johnston, Ron; Pratt, Geraldine; Watts, Michael y Whatmore, Sarah (eds.) (2009). The Dictionary of Human Geography. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
Guilbaud, Pierre; Lefebvre, Henri y Renaudie, Serge (2009). “Concours international pour la restructuration de Novi Beograd”. Bitter, Sabine y Weber, Helmut (eds.). Autogestion, or Henri Lefebvre in New Belgrade. Boston: Sternberg: 1−71.
Haraway, Donna. “A manifesto for cyborgs”. Australian Feminist Studies 2:4 (1987): 1−42.
Harvey, David (1973). Social Justice and the City. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Harvey, David (1996). Justice, nature and the geography of difference. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
Harvey, David (2014). Seventeen Contradictions. Londres: Oxford University.
Harvey, David (2019). “Global unrest”. Anti-Capitalist Chronicles 2019-12–19.
Henning, Christoph (2019). “The politics of nature, Left and Right”. Thompson, Michael J. (Ed.). Georg Lukács and the Possibility of Critical Social Ontology. Boston: Brill: 289−317.
Heraclitus (2003). Fragments. Nueva York: Penguin.
Heynen, Nik; Hossler, Peter; y Herod, Andrew. “Surviving uneven development”. New Political Economy 16:2 (2011): 239–245.
Hickman, Leo (2010). “James Lovelock on the value of sceptics and why Copenhagen was doomed”. Guardian, 2010-03-29.
Hornborg, Alf. “Artifacts have consequences, not agency”. European Journal of Social Theory 20 (2017): 95−110.
Ilyenkov, Evald V, (2008). Dialectical Logic. Delhi: Aakar.
Kofman, Eleonore y Lebas, Elizabeth (1996). “Lost in transposition”. Kofman, Eleonore y Lebas, Elizabeth (eds.). Writings on Cities. Malden: Blackwell: 3–60.
Kolakowski Leszek y Lefebvre, Henri (1974). “Evolution or revolution”. Elders, Fons (ed.). Reflexive Water. Londres: Souvenir: 201-267.
Kouvelakis, Stathis (2007). “Henri Lefebvre, thinker of urban modernity”. Bidet, Jacques y Kouvelakis Stathis (eds.). Critical Companion to Contemporary Marxism. Londres: Brill: 711−727.
Lave, Rebecca. Engaging within the academy. ACME 13:4 (2015): 508–515.
Lave, Rebecca; Wilson, Matthew W.; Barron, Elizabeth S.; et al. “Intervention”. Canadian Geographer 58:1 (2014): 1–10.
Lefebvre, Henri (1968). The Sociology of Marx. Nueva York: Pantheon.
Lefebvre, Henri (1969). The Explosion. Nueva York: Monthly Review Press.
Lefebvre, Henri (1970). Lógica formal, lógica dialéctica. México: Siglo XXI.
Lefebvre, Henri (1971). Everyday Life in the Modern World. Nueva York: Harper Torchbook.
Lefebvre, Henri. “Reflections on the politics of space”. Antipode 8:2 (1976a): 30–37.
Lefebvre, Henri (1976b). The Survival of Capitalism. Nueva York: St. Martin’s.
Lefebvre, Henri (1991). The Production of Space. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Lefebvre, Henri (1995). Introduction to Modernity. Londres: Verso.
Lefebvre, Henri (1996). Writings on Cities. Malden: Blackwell.
Lefebvre, Henri. “Comments on a new state form”. Antipode 33:5 (2002): 769−782.
Lefebvre, Henri (2003a). Henri Lefebvre: Key Writings. Londres: Continuum.
Lefebvre, Henri (2003b). The Urban Revolution. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
Lefebvre, Henri (2003c). “Space and the state”. Brenner, Neil; Jessop, Bob; Jones, Martin; y Macleod, Gordon (eds.). State/Space. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell: 84−100.
Lefebvre, Henri (2004). Rhythmanalysis. Londres: Continuum.
Lefebvre, Henri (2009a). Dialectical Materialism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
Lefebvre, Henri (2009b). State, Space, World. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
Lefebvre, Henri (2014a). Critique of Everyday Life. Londres: Verso.
Lefebvre, Henri. “Dissolving city, planetary metamorphosis”. Environment and Planning D 32:2 (2014b): 203–205.
Lefebvre, Henri (2014c). Toward an Architecture of Enjoyment. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
Lefebvre, Henri (2016a). Marxist Thought and the City. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
Lefebvre, Henri (2016b). Metaphilosophy. Londres: Verso.
Lefebvre, Henri (2020). Hegel, Marx, Nietzsche. Londres: Verso.
Lefebvre, Henri; Burgel, Gallia; Burgel, Guy; y Dezes, M. G. “An interview with Henri Lefebvre”. Environment and Planning D 5: 1 (1987): 27–38.
Leiss, William (1994). The Domination of Nature. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University.
Loftus, Alex (2012). Everyday Environmentalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
Lukács, Georg (1974). Conversations with Lukács. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT.
Lucretius (2001). On the Nature of Things. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Malm, Andreas (2018). The Progress of This Storm. Londres: Verso.
Marx, Karl (1963). The Poverty of Philosophy. Nueva York: International.
Marx, Karl (1970), Critique of Hegel’s “Philosophy of Right”. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Marx, Karl (1973). Grundrisse. Londres: Penguin.
Marx, Karl (1974). Early Writings. Londres: Penguin.
Marx, Karl (1976). Capital: Volume One. Londres: Penguin.
Marx, Karl (1981). Capital: Volume Three. Londres: Penguin.
Merrifield, Andy. “The right to the city and beyond”. City 15:3-4 (2011): 473–481.
Mészáros, István (1972). Lukács’ Concept of Dialectic. Londres: Merlin.
Mészáros, István (1975). Marx’s Theory of Alienation. Londres: Merlin.
Mészáros, István (1995). Beyond Capital. Nueva York: Monthly Review Press.
Mészáros, István (2008). The Challenge and Burden of Historical Time. Nueva York: Monthly Review. Press.
Mészáros, István (2010). Social Structure and Forms of Consciousness, vol. 1. Nueva York: Monthly Review. Press.
Mészáros, István (2015). The Necessity of Social Control. Nueva York: Monthly Review Press.
Nail, Thomas (2020). Marx in Motion. Oxford: Oxford University.
Napoletano, Brian M.; Foster, John Bellamy; Clark, Brett; Urquijo, Pedro S.; et al. “Making space in critical environmental geography for the metabolic rift”. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 109:6 (2019):1811–1828.
Napoletano, Brian M. y Clark, Brett. “An ecological-Marxist response to the Half-Earth project”. Conservation and Society 18:1 (2020): 37–49.
Napoletano, Brian M.; Clark, Brett; Foster, John Bellamy; y Urquijo, Pedro S. “Sustainability and metabolic revolution in the works of Henri Lefebvre”. World 1:3 (2020): 300–316.
Petras, James y Veltmeyer, Henry (2006). “Worker self-management in historical perspective, 1950-2006”.
Radcliffe, Sarah A.; Watson, Elizabeth E.; Simmons, Ian; et al. “Environmentalist thinking and/in geography”. Progress in Human Geography 34:1 (2010): 98–116.
Reclus, Elisee (1995). Man and Nature. Petersham: Jura Media.
Ritter, Carl (1865). Comparative Geography. Edimburgo: William Blackwood.
Ronneberger, Klaus (2009). “Henri Lefebvre and the question of autogestion”. Bitter, Sabine y Weber, Helmut (eds.). Autogestion, or Henri Lefebvre in New Belgrade. Boston: Sternberg: 89–116.
Rose, Ed. “Generalized Self-Management”. Human Relations 31:7 (1978): 617–630.
Said, Edward. W (1993). Culture and Imperialism. Nueva York: Vintage.
Sauer, Carl O. (2008). “The morphology of landscape”. Oakes, Timothy y Price, Patricia L. (eds.). The Cultural Geography Reader. Londres: Routledge: 96–104.
Schmidt, Alfred (1971). The Concept of Nature in Marx. Londres: Verso.
Schmidt, Jessica. “The empirical falsity of the human subject”. Resilience 1:3 (2013): 174−192.
Smith, Neil (1996). “The production of nature”. Robertson, George; Mash, Melinda; Tickner, Lisa; et al. (eds.). Futurenatural. Londres: Routledge: 35–54.
Smith, Neil (1997). “Antinomies of space and nature in Henri Lefebvre’s The Production of Space”. Light, Andrew y
Smith, Jonathan M. (eds.). Philosophy and Geography II. Londres: Rowman & Littlefield: 49–70.
Smith, Neil (2003). “Foreword”. Lefebvre, Henri. The Urban Revolution. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota: vii-xxiii.
Smith, Neil (2008). Uneven Development. Atlanta: University of Georgia.
Smith, Neil. “The revolutionary imperative”. Antipode 41:s1 (2009): 50–65.
Soper, Kate. “Of OncoMice and female/men”. Capitalism Nature Socialism 10:3 (1999): 73−80.
Soper, Kate (2020). Post-Growth Living. Londres: Verso.
Stanek, Łukasz (2008). “Space as concrete abstraction”. Goonewardena, Kanishka; Kipfer, Stefan; Milgrom, Richard; y
Schmid, Christian (eds.). Space, Difference, Everyday Life. Nueva York: Routledge: 62–79.
Swyngedouw, Erik (2000). “The Marxian alternative”. Sheppard, Eric y Barnes Trevor J. (eds.). A Companion to Economic Geography. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell: 41–59.
Thrift, Nigel. “The future of geography”. Geoforum 33:3 (2002): 291–298.
Vieta, Marcelo. “The stream of self-determination and autogestión”. Ephemera 14:4 (2014): 781-809.
Wallace, Rob (2020). Dead Epidemiologists. Nueva York: Monthly Review Press.
Whatmore, Sarah (1999). “Hybrid geographies”. Massey, Doreen; Allen, John; y Sarre, Phil (eds.). Human Geography Today. Hoboken: Wiley: 22–39.
Williams, Raymond (1977). Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University.
Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
Añadir comentario
Copyright (c) 2022 Brian Napoletano, Pedro Urquijo, Brett Clark, John Bellamy Foster
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional.
ISSN: 2340-1869 URL: http://ojs.uv.es/index.php/kamchatka
