Funcionamiento diferencial del ítem de la evaluación internacional PISA. Detección y comprensión
Resumen
Palabras clave
Texto completo:
PDFReferencias
Agresti, A. (1984). Analysis of ordinal categorical data. New York: Wiley and Sons.
Agresti, A. (1990). Categorical Data Analysis. New York: Wiley and Sons.
Allauf, A., Hambleton, R.K., y Sireci, S.G. (1999). Identifying the Causes of DIF in Translated Verbal Items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 36(3), 185-198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1999.tb00553.x
Berk, R. A. (Ed.) (1982). Handbook of methods for detecting item bias. Baltimore, John Hopkins Universtity Press.
Camilli, G., y L. A. Shepard (1994). Methods for identifying biased test items. London, Sage.
Dorans, N.J., y Holland, P.W. (1993). DIF detection and description: Mantel-Haenszel and Standarization. En P.W.Holland y H.Wainer (Eds.) Differential Item Functioning (pp. 35-66) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Dorans, N. J., y Kulick, E. (1986). Demonstrating the utility of the standarization approach to assessing unexpected differential item performance on the scholastic aptitude test. Journal of educational measurement 23(4), 355-368.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1986.tb00255.x
Elosua, P., y Hambleton, R.K. (en prensa). Improving the Methodology for Detecting Biased Test Items. International Journal of Testing Elosua, P., y López, A. (1999). Funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems y sesgo en la adaptación de dos pruebas verbales. Psicológica, 20, 23-40.
Elosua, P., y López-Jauregui, A. (en prensa). Potential DIF sources in the adaptation of tests. International Journal of Testing.
Elosua, P., y López-Jauregui, A. (en prensa). Aplicación de cuatro procedimientos de detección del funcionamiento diferencial so-bre ítems politómicos. Psicothema.
Elosua, P., López, A., y Egaña, J. (2000). Idioma de aplicación y rendimiento en una prueba de comprensión verbal. Psicothema 12(2), 201-206.
Elosua, P., López, A., Ega-a, J., Artamendi, J. A., y Yenes, F. (2000). Funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems en la aplicación de pruebas psicológicas en entornos bilingües. Revista de Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, 2(1), 17-33.
Elosua, P., López, A., y Torres, E. (2000). Desarrollos didácticos y funcionamiento diferencial de los ítems. Problemas inherentes a toda investigación empírica sobre sesgo. Psicothema, 12(2), 198-202.
Ercikan, K. (2002). Disentangling Sources of Differential Item Functioning in Multilanguage Assessments. International Journal of Testing 2(3-4), 199-215.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2002.9669493
Gierl, M.J., y McEwen, N. (1995). Differential Item Functioning on the Alberta Education Social Studies 30 Diploma Exams. Pa-per presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Society for Studies in Education, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Gierl, M. J., y Khaliq, S.N. (2001). Identifying Sources of Differential Item and Bundle Functioning on Translaten Achievement Tests: A Confirmatory Analysis. Journal of Educational Measurement 38(2), 164-187.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2001.tb01121.x
Hambleton, R. K. (2001). The next genera-tion of the ITC test translation and adaptation guidelines. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17(3), 164-172.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1027//1015-5759.17.3.164
Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P.F., y Spielberger, C.D. (Eds.) (2005). Adapting Edu-cational and Psychological Tests for Cross-Cultural Assessment. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hambleton, R.K., y Jones, R.W. (1994). Comparison of Empirical and Judgmental Procedures For Detecting Differential Item Functioning. Educational Research Quarterly, 18 (1), 21-37.
Hambleton, R. K., y Patsula, L. (1999). In-creasing the validity of Adapted tests: Myths to be avoided and guidelines for im-proving test adaptation practices. Journal of Applied testing Technology, 1(1).
Holland, P.W., y Thayer, D.T. (1988). Differential Item Performance and the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. En H. Wainer y H.J. Braun (Eds.), Test validity (pp. 129-145). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Hulin, C.L. (1987). A psychometric theory of evaluations of Item Scale Translations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18(2), 115-142.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022002187018002001
Hulin, C.L., y Mayer, L. (1986). Psychometric equivalence of a translation of the job descriptive index into Hebrew. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(1), 83-94.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.1.83
INECSE (2005). Programa PISA. Pruebas de Comprensión Lectora. Madrid: INECSE
López, A., y Elosua, P. (2002). Análisis de contenido y funcionamiento diferencial del ítem en una prueba de aptitud numérica. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada 55(3), 349-362.
Mantel, N., y Haenszel, W. M. (1959). Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 22, 719-748.
Millsap, R. E., y Everson, H.T. (1993). Methodology review: statistical approaches for assessing measurement bias. Applied psychological measurement 17(4), 297-334.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014662169301700401
Potenza, M. T., y Dorans, N.J. (1995). DIF assessment for polytomously scored items: a framework for classification and evaluation. Applied psychological measurement 19(1), 23-37.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014662169501900104
Rogers, H.J., y Swaminathan, H. (1993) A comparison of the logistic regression and Mantel-Hanszel procedures for detecting Differential Item Functioning. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17(2), 105-117.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014662169301700201
Shealy, R., y Stout, W. (1993). A model-based standarization approach that separates true bias/dif from group ability differences and detects test bias/DTF as well as item bias/DIF. Psychometrika 58(2), 159-194.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02294572
Spray, J., y Miller, T. (1994). Identifying nonuniform DIF in polytomously scored test items (American College Testing Research Report Series 94-1). Iowa City, IA: American College Testing Program.
Swaminathan, H., y Rogers, H.J. (1990). Detecting differential item functioning us-ing logistic regression procedures. Journal of educational measurement 27(4), 361-370.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1990.tb00754.x
Tian, F. (1999). Detecting differential item functioning in polytomous items. Un-published doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa.
Thomas, D.R., y Zumbo, B.D. (1996). Variable importance in regression and related analysis. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Banff, AB, Canada.
van de Vijver, F. J. R., y Tanzer, N. K. (1997). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: An overview. Europe-an Review of Applied Psychology, 47(4), 263-279.
Zwick, R., Donogue J. R., y Grima, K.L. (1993). Assessment of Differential Item Functioning for Performance Tasks. Journal of Educational Measurement 30(3), 233-251.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1993.tb00425.x
Zwick, R., y D. T. Thayer (1996). Evaluating the magnitude of differential item functioning in polytomous items Journal of educational and behavioral statistics 21(3), 187-201.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/10769986021003187
Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
