DOI: https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.26.1.17089

Participación e implicación del estudiante en la evaluación: implicar a todo el estudiante en la búsqueda de la justicia y el bien social


Resumen


En este artículo ofrezco una perspectiva sobre la participación de los estudiantes en la evaluación informada por la teoría crítica y sustentada por un compromiso con una mayor justicia social dentro y a través de la educación superior. Se basa en trabajos anteriores sobre la evaluación de la justicia social para argumentar que la participación de los estudiantes en la evaluación debe ser considerada más ampliamente, no solo que los estudiantes realicen determinadas tareas. En lugar de ello, debemos pensar en el estudiante como una persona completa, socialmente situada y en las formas en que la participación en las tareas de evaluación fomenta tanto el bienestar individual como el social. Hay tres corrientes en el argumento propuesto. En primer lugar, la investigación sobre la evaluación debe hacer más para problematizar la naturaleza del conocimiento y que la comprensión de las complejidades del conocimiento en la educación superior tiene vínculos tanto con las experiencias de nuestro estudiante como una persona completa, como con justicia social. En segundo lugar, los propósitos de la evaluación deberían orientarse hacia la noción de teoría crítica de un bien común, en la que el bienestar individual y social están dialécticamente interrelacionados. Por último, al pensar en la participación del estudiante en la evaluación. debemos ir más allá de la fusión del mundo real con el mundo del trabajo, que figura en gran parte de la literatura sobre la evaluación auténtica. Propongo, en cambio, la importancia de entender el ámbito económico como una esfera amplia y heterogénea que no puede desarticularse del ámbito social.


Palabras clave


Participación del estudiante; Teoría crítica; Bienestar social; Justicia social; Evaluación auténtica; Rendimiento del estudiante; Honneth; Reconocimiento mutuo; Evaluación respondente

Texto completo:

PDF (English) PDF

Referencias


  • Adorno, T. W. (2001). Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (1959). Polity.

  • Ashford-Rowe, K., Herrington, J., & Brown, C. (2014). Establishing the critical elements that determine authentic assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(2), 205-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.819566  

  • Ashwin, P. (2014). Knowledge, curriculum and student understanding in higher education. Higher Education, 67, 123-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9715-3

  • Ashwin, P., Abbas, A., & McLean, M. (2012). The pedagogic device: Sociology, knowledge practice and teaching-learning processes. In P. Trowler, M. Saunders, & V. Bamber (Eds.), Tribes and Territories in the 21st century: rethinking the significance of disciplines in higher education (pp. 118-129). Routledge.

  • Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity. Rowman and Littlefield.

  • Biglan, A. (1973). The Characteristics of Subject Matter in Different Academic Areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195-203. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034701

  • Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (1999). Peer Learning and Assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4), 413-426. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293990240405  

  • Bovill, C. (2013). Staff–student partnerships in higher education. Educational Review, 65(3), 380-382. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2012.659454

  • Bovill, C., Bulley, C. J., & Morss, K. (2011). Engaging and Empowering First-Year Students through Curriculum Design: Perspectives from the Literature. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(2), 197-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2010.515024

  • Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as Co-Creators of Teaching Approaches, Course Design, and Curricula: Implications for Academic Developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 133-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2011.568690

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000). The Social Life of Information. Harvard Business School Press.

  • Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315-1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354

  • Deeley, S. J., & Bovill, C. (2017). Student-staff partnership in assessment: enhancing assessment literacy through democratic practices. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3), 463-477. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1126551

  • Douglas Smith, C., Worsfold, K., Davies, L., Fisher, R., & McPhail, R. (2013). Assessment literacy and student learning: the case for explicitly developing students ‘assessment literacy. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(1), 44-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.598636

  • Eddy, P. L., & Lawrence, A. (2013). Wikis as Platforms for Authentic Assessment. Innovative Higher Education, 38, 253-265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-012-9239-7  

  • Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 287-322. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070003287  

  • Forsyth, H., & Evans, J. (2019). Authentic assessment for a more inclusive history. Higher Education Research and Development, 38(4), 748-761. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1581140

  • Freire, P. (1996). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Penguin.

  • Hardarson, A. (2017). Aims of Education:  How to Resist the Temptation of Technocratic Models. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 51(1), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12182  

  • Honneth, A. (1996). Struggle for Recognition. Polity Press.

  • Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution as Recognition:  A Response to Nancy Fraser. In N. Fraser & A. Honneth (Eds.), Redistribution or Recognition?  A political-philosophical exchange (pp. 110-197). Verso.

  • Honneth, A. (2004a). A social pathology of reason:  on the intellectual legacy of Critical Theory. In F. Rush (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Critical Theory (pp. 336-360). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521816602.014  

  • Honneth, A. (2004b). Recognition and justice: outline of a plural theory of justice. Acta sociologica, 47(4), 351-364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699304048668  

  • Honneth, A. (2010). The Political Identity of the Green Movement in Germany:  Social-Philosophical Reflections. Critical Horizons, 11(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1558/crit.v11i1.5  

  • Horkheimer, M. (1993). Between Philosophy and Social Science:  Selected Early Writings. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1565.001.0001

  • James, L. T., & Casidy, R. (2018). Authentic assessment in business education: its effects on student satisfaction and promoting behaviour. Studies in Higher Education, 43(3), 401-415. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1165659  

  • Liu, N.-F., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680582  

  • McArthur, J. (2011). Reconsidering the social and economic purposes of higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(6), 737-749. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.539596   

  • McArthur, J. (2012). Against standardised experience:  leaving our marks on the palimpsests of disciplinary knowledge. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(4), 485-496. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.711934  

  • McArthur, J. (2013). Rethinking Knowledge in Higher Education:  Adorno and Social Justice. Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/ 10.5040/9781472553225

  • McArthur, J. (2016). Assessment for Social Justice: the role of assessment in achieving social justice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(7), 967-981. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1053429  

  • McArthur, J. (2018). Assessment for Social Justice. Perspectives and practices within Higher Education. Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474236089

  • McArthur, J. (2020). Assessment for Social Justice: achievement, uncertainty and recognition. In C. Callender, W. Locke, & S. Marginson (Eds.), Changing Higher Education for a Changing World. Bloomsbury.

  • McGarr, O., & Clifford, A. M. (2013). 'Just enough to make you take it seriously': exploring students' attitudes towards peer assessment. Higher Education, 65, 677-693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9570-z

  • McLean, M. (2006). Pedagogy and the University. Critical Theory and Practice. Continuum.

  • Norton, L. (2004). Using assessment criteria as learning criteria:  a case study in psychology. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(6), 687-702. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042000227236   

  • Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (2000). The Use of Student Derived Marking Criteria in Peer and Self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(1), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930050025006  

  • Raymond, J. E., Homer, C. S. E., Smith, R., & Gray, J. E. (2013). Learning through authentic assessment:  An evaluation of a new development in the undergraduate midwifery curriculum. Nurse Education in Practice, 13, 471-476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2012.10.006  

  • Shay, S. (2008). Beyond social constructivist perspectives on assessment: the centring of knowledge. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(5), 595-605. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510802334970

  • Villarroel, V., Bloxham, S., Bruna, D., Bruna, C., & Herrera-Seda, C. (2018). Authentic assessment: creating a blueprint for course design. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 840-854. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1412396  

  • Winch, C. (2002). Work, Well-being and Vocational Education:  The Ethical Significance of Work and Preparation for Work. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 19(3), 261 - 271. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5930.t01-1-00222


Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.




Licencia de Creative Commons
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional.

https://ojs.uv.es/public/site/images/aliaga/scopus_170  https://ojs.uv.es/public/site/images/aliaga/esci_225