The science of difference: The invisibility of women in health sciences


Abstract


Women remained invisible in health sciences until the late twentieth century because they were not included in the cohorts used in researched studies. Thanks to the work done by different groups of feminist researchers, we were able to visualise the need to change those paradigms. But while gender perspectives have allowed us to research new aspects of science, gender has sometimes contributed to rendering female-specific health issues as invisible. For women to be treated equally, their differences have to be recognised, precisely so that the equal right of both sexes to quality of life can be defended. Therefore, the science of difference should be included in research and taught in all health science specialisations.

 


Keywords


gender and health; differential morbidity; gender perspective; equality; differences

Full Text:

PDF

References


  1. Díaz, C. (2002). Conversational heuristic as a reflexive method for feminist research. International Review of Sociology, 12(2), 249–255. doi: 10.1080/0390670022000012477

  2. Fausto-Sterling, A. (2006). Cuerpos sexuados. Barcelona: Melusina.

  3. Freedman, L. S., Simon, R., Foulkes, M. A., Friedman, L., Geller, N. L., Gordon, D. J., & Mowery, R. (1995). Inclusion of women and minorities in clinical trials and the NIH Revitalization Act of 1993 – The perspective of NIH clinical trialists. Controlled Clinical Trials, 16(5), 277–285.

  4. Harding, S. (1996). Ciencia y feminismo. Madrid: Morata. (Original work published in 1986).

  5. Keller, E. F. (2004). What impact, if any, has feminism had on science? Journal of Bioscience, 29(1), 7–13. doi: 10.1007/BF02702556

  6. Joel, D., Berman, Z., Tavor, I., Wexler, N., Gaber, O., Stein, Y., … Assaf, Y. (2015). Sex beyond the genitalia: The human brain mosaic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(50), 15468–15473. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1509654112

  7. Pinn, V. W. (2003). Sex and gender factors in medical studies: Implications for health and clinical practice. Journal of the American Medical Association, 289(4), 397–400. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.4.397

  8. Ritz, S. A., Antle D. M., Côté, J., Deroy, K., Fraleigh, N., Messing, K., ... Mergler, D. (2014). First steps for integrating sex and gender considerations into basic experimental biomedical research. The FASEB Journal, 28(1), 4–13. doi: 10.1096/fj.13-233395

  9. Rosser, S. V. (1986). Teaching science and health from a feminist perspective. A practical guide. New York: Pergamon Press.

  10. Sau, V. (2000). Reflexiones feministas para principios de siglo. Madrid: Horas y HORAS.

  11. Tingen, C., Nagel, J. D., & Clayton, J. A. (2013). Monitoring the implementation of the National Institutes of Health Strategic Plan for Women’s Health and Sex/Gender Differences Research: Strategies and successes. Global Advances in Health and Medicine, 2(5), 44–49. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2013.051

  12. Tomás, C., Yago, T., Eguiluz, M., Samitier, M. L., Oliveros, T., & Palacios, G. (2014). A tool to assess sex-gender when selecting health research projects. Atención Primaria, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2014.05.010

  13. Verbrugge, L. M. (1985). Gender and health: An update on hypotheses and evidence. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 26(3), 156–182.

  14. Valls-Llobet, C. (2006). Mujeres invisibles. Barcelona: Debolsillo.

  15. Valls-Llobet, C. (2009). Mujeres, salud y poder. Madrid: Editorial Cátedra.







Creative Commons License
Texts in the journal are –unless otherwise indicated– published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________