Science and ideology: The case of physics in Nazi Germany


Science is not «above» politics and ethics: it is intrinsically political, and constantly raises ethical dilemmas. The consequences of evading such issues were made particularly clear in the actions of scientists working in Nazi Germany in the 1930s and 40s. The accusation in 2006 that Dutch physicist Peter Debye was an opportunist who colluded with the Nazis reopened the debate about the conduct of physicists at that time. Here I consider what those events can tell us about the relationship of science and politics today. I argue that an insistence that science is an abstract, apolitical inquiry into nature is a myth that can leave it morally compromised and vulnerable to political manipulation.


Nazism; German physics; science and politics; Peter Debye

Full Text:



  • Ball, P. (2014). Serving the Reich. London: Bodley Head.

  • Berg, P. (1980). Asilomar and recombinant DNA. Nobel Lecture. Retrieved, from

  • Beyerchen, A. D. (1977). Scientists under Hitler: Politics and the physics community in the Third Reich. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  • Cassidy, D. C. (2009). Beyond uncertainty: Heisenberg, quantum physics, and the bomb. New York: Bellevue Literary Press.

  • Eickhoff, M. (2008). In the name of science? P. J. W. Debye and his career in Nazi Germany. Amsterdam: Aksant.

  • Goudsmit, S. (1948, 20 September). Letter to W. Heisenberg (box 10, folder 95). Samuel Goudsmit Papers, American Institute of Physics.

  • Haberer, J. (1969). Politics and the community of science. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

  • Heilbron, J. L. (2000). The dilemmas of an upright man: Max Planck and the fortunes of German science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Heisenberg, W. (1948, 5 January). Letter to S. Goudsmit (box 10, folder 95). Samuel Goudsmit Papers, American Institute of Physics.

  • Hoffmann, D. (2005). Between autonomy and accommodation: The German Physical Society during the Third Reich. Physics in Perspective, 7(3), 293–329. doi: 10.1007/s00016-004-0235-x

  • Hoffmann, D., & Walker, M. (March 2006). Peter Debye: A typical scientist in an untypical time. Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft. Retrieved from

  • Hoffmann, D., & Walker, M. (Eds.). (2011). «Fremde» Wissenschaftler im Dritten Reich. Die Debye-Affäre im Kontext. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag.

  • Macrakis, K. (1993). Surviving the swastika: Scientific research in Nazi Germany. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Mosse, G. L. (Ed.). (1966). Nazi culture: Intellectual, cultural and social life in the Third Reich. New York: Grosset & Dunlap.

  • Powers, T. (2000). Heisenberg’s War. Boston: Da Capo.

  • Rammer, G. (2012). «Cleanliness among our circle of colleagues»: The German Physical Society’s Policy toward its past. In D. Hoffmann, & M. Walker (Eds.), The German Physical Society in the Third Reich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Renneburg, M., & Walker, M. (Eds.). (1994). Science, technology and national socialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Rispens, S. I. (2006). Einstein in Nederland: Een intellectuelle biographie. Amsterdam: Ambo.

  • US House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. (2007). Political interference with climate change science under the Bush Administration. Retrieved from

  • Van Ginkel, G. (2006). Prof. Peter J. W. Debye (1884-1966) in 1935-1945: An investigation of historical sources. The Netherlands: RIPCN.

  • Walker, M. (1995). Nazi science: Myth, truth and the German atomic bomb. New York: Plenum.

  • Walker, M. (Ed.). (2003). Science and ideology: A comparative history. London: Routledge.

Creative Commons License
Texts in the journal are –unless otherwise indicated– published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License