DOI: https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.11.16103

Towards the right standards: The intersection of open science, responsible research and innovation, and standards


Abstract


The introduction of standards in research and development leading to new products or innovative processes can be thought of as a particularly technical approach to framing scientific enterprises. At the other end of the spectrum, open science or responsible research and innovation may be initially thought of as concepts with no underlying technical approaches to support them. In reality as currently practiced, the development and use of standards engages significant non-technical aspects, needing to take into account research cultures or desired societal outcomes. Similarly, open science, and responsible research and innovation can operate using very practical and technical approaches. This essay focuses at the intersections of these concepts to try to contribute to larger discussions in both the research and governance communities as to how researchers should conduct their research, and what respective responsibilities of researchers, their institutes, and their supporters are.


Keywords


standards; open science; responsible research and innovation

References


  • BioRoboost. (2019). Bioroboost. Retrieved April 1, 2020, from http://standardsinsynbio.eu/?page_id=53

  • cOAlition S. (2019). About Plan S. Retrieved April 2, 2020, from https://www.coalition-s.org/

  • CoNOSC. (2020). Council for National Open Science Coordination. Retrieved April 2, 2020, from https://conosc.org/

  • European Commission. (2014). Responsible research and innovation: Europe’s ability to respond to societal challenges. European Union. Retrieved April 1, 2020, from https://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_rri/KI0214595ENC.pdf

  • European Commission. (2020). Open Science Policy Platform. Retrieved April 2, 2020, from https://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/index.cfm?pg=open-science-policy-platform

  • Force11. (2017). The FAIR data principles. Retrieved March 31, 2020, from https://www.force11.org/group/fairgroup/fairprinciples

  • Garfinkel, M. (2012). ESF strategic workshop on biological containment of synthetic microorganisms: Science and policy. European Science Foundation Exploratory Grant. Retrieved April 2, 2020, from https://www.embo.org/documents/science_policy/biocontainment_ESF_EMBO_2012_workshop_report.pdf

  • Hof, R. D. (2011, 25 July). Lessons from Sematech. MIT Technology Review. Retrieved March 31, 2020, from https://www.technologyreview.com/s/424786/lessons-from-sematech/

  • Owen, R., Macnaghten, P., & Stilgoe, J. (2012). Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy, 39(6), 751–760. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scs093

  • Pulverer, B. (2015). When things go wrong: Correcting the scientific record. EMBO Journal 34, 2483–2485. doi: 10.15252/embj.201570080







Creative Commons License
Texts in the journal are –unless otherwise indicated– published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________