Aircraft clouds: From chemtrail pseudoscience to the science of contrails

Jordi Mazon, Marcel Costa, David Pino

Abstract


The most frequent statements and arguments found in pseudoscience websites and forums supporting the existence of so-called aircraft chemtrails can be refuted with a scientific explanation of the processes resulting in the formation of condensation or deposition trails, known as contrails. Thus, the hypothesis that chemtrails exist is disproven by the scientific literature that shows that they are the exact same entity as contrails: They are hydrological phenomena which result from a physical process referenced in the many studies carried out since the beginning of the age of aviation, in the early twentieth century. Hence, in this paper we conclude that pseudoscience’s chemtrails are nothing more than the contrails described by science.

Keywords


chemtrails; contrails; pseudoscience; science; high-level clouds

Full Text: PDF

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.8.9954

References


Appleman, H. (1953). The formation of exhaust condensation trails by jet aircraft. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 34, 14–20.

Brewer, A. W. (1946). Condensation trails. Weather1, 34–40. doi: 10.1002/j.1477-8696.1946.tb00024.x

Ettenreich, R. (1919). Wolkenbildung über einer Feuersbrunst und an Flugzeugabgasen. Meteorologische Zeitschrift36, 355–356.

Gierens, K. M. (1996). Numerical simulations of persistent contrails. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 53(22), 3333–3348. doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1996)053<3333:NSOPC>2.0.CO;2

Kärcher, B., Peter, T., Biermann, U. M., & Schumann, U. (1996). The initial composition of jet condensation trails. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences53(21), 3066–3083. doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1996)053<3066:TICOJC>2.0.CO;2

Mazon, J., & Pino, D. (2016). A WRF simulation of an episode of contrails covering the entire sky. Atmosphere7(7), 95. doi: 10.3390/atmos7070095

Mazon, J., Costa, M., Pino, D., & Lorente, J. (2012). Clouds caused by human activities. Weather67(11), 302–306. doi: 10.1002/wea.1949

Mercer, A. M., Keith D. W., & Sharp, J. D. (2011). Public understanding of solar radiation management. Environmental Research Letters, (6)4, 044006. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/044006

Minnis, P., Young, D. F., Garber, D. P., Nguyen, L., Smith, W. L., & Palikonda, R. (1998). Transformation of contrails into cirrus during SUCCES. Geophysical Research Letters25(8), 1157–1160. doi: 10.1029/97GL03314

Minnis, P., Ayers, J. K., Palikonda, R., & Phan, D. (2004). Contrails, cirrus trends, and climate. Journal of Climate, 17, 1672–1685. doi: 10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<1671:CCTAC>2.0.CO;2

Ryan, A. C., MacKenzie, A. R., Watkins, S., & Timmis, R. (2011). World War II contrails: A case study of aviation-induced cloudiness. International Journal of Climatology32(11), 1745–1753. doi: 10.1002/joc.2392

Schröder, F., Kärcher, B., Duroure, C., Ström, J., Petzold, A., Gayet, J. F, … Borrmann, S. (2000). On the transition of contrails into cirrus clouds. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences57, 464–480. doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<0464:OTTOCI>2.0.CO;2

Schumann, U. (1996). On conditions for contrail formation from aircraft exhausts. Meteorologische ZeitschriftN.F. 5, 4–23.

Schumann, U., & Wendling, P. (1990). Determination of contrails from satellite data and observational results. In U. Schumann (Ed.), Air Traffic and the Environment—Background, Tendencies and Potential Global Atmospheric Effects (pp. 138–153). Berlin: Springer–Verlag.

Shearer, C., West, M., Caldeira, K., & Davis, S. J. (2016). Quantifying expert consensus against the existence of a secret, large-scale atmospheric spraying program. Environmental Research Letters11(8), 084011. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/129501

Varney, B. M. (1921). The Argonne battle cloud. Monthly Weather Review49(6), 348–349. doi: 10.1175/1520-0493(1921)49<348b:TABC>2.0.CO;2

Weickmann, L. (1919). Wolkenbildung durch ein Flugzeug. Naturwissen­schaften7(34), 625. doi: 10.1007/BF01497120


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.