History and reality of the genus ‘Homo’: What is it and why do we think so?


Abstract


Paleoanthropologists who worry about how nature is organized into species, and about what we should call them, are very often accused by their peers of «just arguing about names». This implies that basic taxonomy is a boring clerical operation that should be dispensed with as quickly as possible or even ignored, so that we can get to the really interesting questions about human evolution. Yet the reality is that we shall never understand the events of the intricate human evolutionary play if we cannot accurately identify the actors who participated in that drama. This article looks briefly at how our current supremely woolly concept of the genus Homo has come about, as background for urging a more rational approach to defining it.


Keywords


taxonomy; genera; genus 'Homo'; palaeoanthropology

Full Text:

PDF

References


  • Arsuaga, J. L., Martínez, I., Arnold, L. J., Aranburu, A., Gracia-Téllez, A., Sharp, W. D., … Carbonell, E. (2014). Neandertal roots: Cranial and chronological evidence from Sima de los Huesos. Science, 344, 1358–1363. doi: 10.1126/science.1253958 

  • Collard, M., & Wood, B. (2015). Defining the genus Homo. In W. Henke, & I. Tattersall (Eds.), Handbook of paleoanthropology (2n ed., vol. 3, pp. 2107–2144). Heidelberg: Springer.

  • Dirks, P. H. G. M., Roberts, E. M., Hilbert-Wolff, H., Kramers, J. D., Hawks, J., Dosseto, A., … Berger, L. R. (2017). The age of Homo naledi and associated sediments in the Rising Star Cave, South Africa. eLife, 6e24231. doi: 10.7554/eLife.24231

  • Dobzhansky, T. (1944). On species and races of living and fossil man. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2, 251–265. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330020303

  • Haeckel, E. (1868). Natürlische Schöpfungsgeschichte. Berlin: Reimer.

  • Howell, F. C. (1957). The evolutionary significance of variation and varieties of Neanderthal man. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 32, 330–347. doi: 10.1086/401978

  • Keith, A. (1915). The antiquity of man. London: Williams and Norgate.

  • King, W. (1864). The reputed fossil man of the Neanderthal. Quarterly Journal of Science, 1, 88–97.

  • Leakey, L. S. B., Tobias, P. V., & Napier, J. R. (1964). A new species of Homo from Olduvai Gorge. Nature, 202, 7–9. doi: 10.1038/202007a0

  • Leakey, M. G., Spoor, F., Brown, F. H., Gathogo, P. N., Leakey, L. N., & McDougall, I. (2001). New hominin genus from eastern Africa shows diverse middle Pliocene lineages. Nature, 410, 433–440. doi: 10.1038/35068500

  • Linnaeus, C. (1758). Systema Naturae (10th ed.). Stockholm: Salvii.

  • Lordkipanidze, D., Ponce de León, M. S., Margvelashvili, A., Rak, Y., Rightmire, G. P., Vekua, A., & Zollikofer, C. P. E. (2013). A complete skull from Dmanisi, Georgia, and the evolutionary biology of early Homo. Science, 342, 326–331. doi: 10.1126/science.1238484

  • Mayr, E. (1950). Taxonomic categories in fossil hominids. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 15, 109–118. doi: 10.1101/SQB.1950.015.01.013

  • Mayr, E. (1953). Comments on evolutionary literature. Evolution, 7(3), 273–281. doi: 10.2307/2405739

  • Oakley, K. P. (1949). Man the toolmaker. London: Trustees of the British Museum.

  • Robinson, J. T. (1951). Meganthropus, australopithecines and hominids. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 11, 1–38. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330110112

  • Schwartz, J. H., & Tattersall, I. (2015). Defining the genus Homo. Science, 349, 931–932. doi: 10.1126/science.aac6182

  • Semaw, S., Renne, P., Harris, J. W. K., Feibel, C. S., Bernor, L., Fesseha, N., & Mowbray, K. (1997). 2.5 million-year-old stone tools from Gona, Ethiopia. Nature, 385, 333–336. doi: 10.1038/385333a0

  • Sutikna, T., Tocheri, M. W., Morwood, M. J., Saptomo, E., Jatmiko, Awe, R. D., … Roberts, R. G. (2016). Revised stratigraphy and chronology for Homo floresiensis at Liang Bua in Indonesia. Nature, 532, 366–369. doi: 10.1038/nature17179

  • Tattersall, I. (1993). The human odyssey. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  • Tattersall, I. (2015a). Homo ergaster and its contemporaries. In W. Henke, & I. Tattersall (Eds.), Handbook of paleoanthropology (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 2167–2188). Heidelberg: Springer.

  • Tattersall, I. (2015b). Defining and recognizing the genus Homo. Gortania, 36, 5–22.

  • Tattersall, I. (2016). The genus Homo. Inference: International Review of Science, 2(1). Retrieved from inference-review.com/article/the-genus-homo

  • Theunissen, B. (1988). Eugéne Dubois and the Ape-Man from Java: The history of the first “missing link” and its discoverer. Dordrecht/Boston: Kluwer Academic.

  • Villmoare, B., Kimbel, W. H., Seyoum, C., Campisano, E. N., DiMaggio, E. N., Rowan, J., … Reed, K. E. (2015). Early Homo at 2.8 Ma from Ledi-Geraru, Afar, Ethiopia. Science, 347, 1352–1355. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa1343

  • Weidenreich, F. (1939). Six lectures on Sinanthropus pekinensis and related problems. Journal of the Geologicual Society of China, 19, 1–110. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6724.1939.mp19001008.x

  • Wood, B., & Collard, M. (1999). The human genus. Science, 284, 65–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6724.1939.mp19001008.x




Bookmark and Share



Creative Commons LicenseTexts in the journal are –unless otherwise indicated– published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________