Green taxes, quotas and equality: Preserving social justice whilst averting climate change


Abstract


The need for green fiscal reform is urgent in the face of climate change. Some oppose it, however, arguing that such reforms disproportionately burden poorer individuals whose emissions are far smaller than those of wealthier individuals. Defusing these criticisms, this paper argues that this is not an inevitable feature of green fiscal reform. We should adopt a more scientific attitude not only towards climate change but towards testing fiscal proposals to mitigate it, and avoid dividing, with rushed assumptions, responsible voters who care about both equality and climate change.


Keywords


climate change; carbon quotas and taxes; regressive taxes; inequality; green fiscal reform

Full Text:

PDF

References


  • Casal, P. (2007). Why sufficiency is not enough. Ethics, 117, 296–326. doi: 10.1086/510692

  • Cramton, P., & Stoft, S. (2010). Price is a better climate commitment. The Economists’ Voice, 7(1). doi: 10.2202/1553-3832.1718

  • Fellows, J. A. (1994). Consumption taxes. A view of future tax reform in America. The CPA Journal, 64. Retrieved from http://links.uv.es/UkECf59

  • Frank, R., & Cook, P. J. (1995). The winner-take-all society. New York: Free Press.

  • Galle, B. (2011). Is cap and trade fair to the poor? George Washington Law Review, 79, 33–110.

  • Gibbs, T., & Retallack, S. (2006). TradingUp: Reforming the European Union’s emissions trading scheme. London: IPPR.

  • Goodin, R. (1994). Selling Environmental Indulgencies. Kyklos, 47(4), 573–596.

  • Hanemann, M., Labandeira, X., & Loureiro, M. (2011). Climate change, energy, and social preferences on policies. Climate Research, 48(2–3), 343–348. doi: 10.3354/cr00994

  • Hansen, J. (2009). Storms of my grandchildren. London: Bloomsbury.

  • House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee. (2008). Personal carbon trading. Fifth report of session 2007-08. London: The Stationery Office Limited. Retrieved from http://links.uv.es/Lzqd9XA

  • McCaffery, E. (1992). Tax policy under a hybrid income-consumption tax. Texas Law Review, 70, 1149–1181.

  • Pearce, D. (1995). World without end. London: Earthscan.

  • Piketty, Th. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First century. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

  • Poterba, J. M. (1991). Is the gasoline tax regressive? National Bureau of Economic Research. Tax Policy and the Economy, 5, 145–164. doi: 10.3386/w3578

  • Sandel, M. (2012). What money can’t buy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

  • Seidman, L. (1999). The USA tax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Sterner, T. (2012). Distributional effects of taxing transport fuel. Energy Policy, 41, 75–83. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.012

  • Tiezzi, S. (2005). The welfare effects and the distributive impact of carbon taxation on Italian households. Energy Policy, 33, 1597–1612. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.01.016

  • Toynbee, P. (2006, December 15). This eclectic radicalism marries green politics with social justice. The Guardian, p. 37.

  • Wier, M., Birr-Pedersen, K., Klinge Jacobsen, H., & Klok, J. (2005). Are CO2 taxes regressive? Ecological Economics, 52(2), 239–251. doi: 10.1016/ j.ecolecon.2004.08.005

  • Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level. Why more equal societies almost always do better. London: Penguin.







Creative Commons License
Texts in the journal are –unless otherwise indicated– published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________