Consensus and contrarianism on climate change: How the USA case informs dynamics elsewhere


Abstract


Against a contrasting backdrop of consensus on key issues on climate science, a heterogeneous group dubbed climate «skeptics», «contrarians», «deniers» have significantly shaped contemporary discussions of climate science, politics and policy in the public sphere. This essay focuses on the USA context, and explores some of the intertwined social, political and economic factors, as well as cultural and psychological characteristics that have together influenced public attitudes, intentions, beliefs, perspective and behaviors in regards to climate change science and governance over time. This article makes the case that the USA example can inform developments elsewhere; as such it is important to consider these contextual elements to more capably appraise «contrarian», «skeptic», «denier» reverberations through the current public discussions on climate change. 


Keywords


consensus; skepticism; contrarianism; climate change; public opinion

Full Text:

PDF

References


  • Barron-Lopez, L. (2014, September 25). EPA chief: Climate skeptics “sad”. The Hill. Retrieved from http://links.uv.es/02RkAVH

  • Boykoff, M., & Olson, S. (2013). “Wise contrarians” in contemporary climate science-policy-public interactions. Celebrity Studies Journal, 4(3), 276–291. doi: 10.1080/19392397.2013.831618

  • Brulle, R. (2014). Institutionalizing delay: Foundation funding and the creation of U.S. climate change counter-movement organizations. Climatic Change, 122(4), 681–694. doi: 10.1007/s10584-013-1018-7

  • Cox, R. (2014, September 24). Sanders blasts GOP climate change deniers. The Hill. Retrieved from http://links.uv.es/Z64xdbM

  • CO2 is green (2010, January 19). More CO2 results in a greener Earth: About us. Co2isgreen.org. Retrieved from http://links.uv.es/78Hnpcq on 2014, October.

  • Dunlap, R. E. (2013). Climate change skepticism and denial: An introduction. American Behavioral Scientist 57(6), 691–698. doi: 10.1177/0002764213477097

  • Dunlap, R. E., & McCright, A. M. (2011). Organized climate change denial. In J. Dryzek, R. Norgaard, & D. Schlosberg (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of climate change and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Field, C. B., Barros, V. R., Mach, K. J., & Mastransrea, M. D. (Coords.). (2014). Technical summary. In C. B. Field, V. R. Barros, D. J. Dokken, K. J. Mach, M. D. Mastrandrea, T. E. Bilir, ...L.L. White (Eds.), Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectorial aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Kahan, D. M., Jenkins-Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2010). Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research, 9(2), 1–28. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1549444

  • Littler, J. (2009). Radical consumption: Shopping for change in contemporary culture. London: Open University Press.

  • Mauldin, W., & Sparshott, J. (2014, September 23). Obama: U.S., China must lead on climate change efforts. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://links.uv.es/T0dC3vP

  • Mayer, J. (2010, August 30). Covert operations: The billionaire brothers who are waging a war against Obama. The New Yorker.

  • McCright, A. M. (2007). Dealing with climate contrarians. In S. C. Moser, & L. Dilling (Eds.), Creating a climate for change: Communicating climate change and facilitating social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Mulkern, A. C. (2010, August 17). Oil group, climate bill supporters clash in summer campaigns. New York Times Greenwire. Retrieved from http://links.uv.es/qz5FnD0

  • Norgaard, K. M. (2006). “People want to protect themselves a little bit”: Emotions, denial, and social movement nonparticipation. Sociological Inquiry, 76(3), 372–396. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.2006.00160.x

  • O’Neill, S. J., & Boykoff, M. (2010). Climate denier, skeptic or contrarian? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, E151. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010507107

  • Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2010). Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. New York: Bloomsbury Press.

  • Rajan, S. R. (2006). Modernizing nature: Forestry and imperial eco-development 1800-1950. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Swim, J., Clayton, S., Doherty, Th., Gifford, R., Howard, G., Reser, J., ...Weber, E. (2009). Psychology and global climate change: Addressing a multi-faceted phenomenon and set of challenges. Washington: American Psychological Association. Retrieved from http://links.uv.es/0CPx8rd

  • Victor, D. (2014, January 8). Global warming denialism: What science has to say – Introduction and documentary video about the people associated with global warming denial. Lecture at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UC San Diego. Retrieved from http://links.uv.es/hS6TO3R







Creative Commons License
Texts in the journal are –unless otherwise indicated– published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________