Genes, genomes, and codes: Revisiting some key terms with multiple meanings


Abstract


Is a genome the full complement of an organism’s genes or of its DNA? Is genetics the study of genes or of heredity? Is the genetic code the mechanism for translating nucleotide sequence to amino acid sequence or to phenotype? Does «genetic information» refer to the sequences coding for proteins or to all DNA sequences? Each of these questions stems from an elision between one, concrete, meaning, and another, open-ended and ambiguous. Such elision invites the illusion that the ambiguity of the open-ended term has been resolved, and by implication, that the gap between actual achievement and promise has been closed. Yet, despite the phenomenal progress molecular biology has made, we remain without an adequate account of the organization of proteins into an organism. 


Keywords


code; codescript; central dogma; genetic information; genes and genomes

Full Text:

PDF

References


  • Ball, P. (2013). DNA: Celebrate the unknowns. Nature, 496, 419–420. doi: 10.1038/496419a

  • Davis, B. D. (1990). The human genome and other initiatives. Science, 249: 342–343.

  • Doolittle, W. F., & Sapienza, C. (1980). Selfish genes, the phenotype paradigm and genome evolution. Nature, 284, 601–603. doi: 10.1038/284601a0

  • Gibbs, W. W. (2003). The unseen genome: Gems among the junk. Scientific American, 289, 46–53. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican1103-46

  • Keller, E. F. (2000). The century of the gene. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Keller, E. F. (2014). From gene action to reactive genomes. The Journal of Physiology, 592(11), 2423-2429. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2014.290991

  • Mattick, J. S. (2004). RNA regulation:

  • A new genetics? Nature Reviews Genetics, 5, 316–323. doi: 10.1038/nrg1321

  • Mattick, J. S. (2010). RNA as the substrate for epigenome-environment interactions: RNA guidance of epigenetic processes and the expansion of RNA editing in animals underpins development, phenotypic plasticity, learning, and cognition. Bioessay, 32, 548–552. doi: 10.1002/bies.201000028

  • Ohno, S. (1972). So much “junk” DNA in our genome. Brookhaven Symposium in Biology, 23, 336–370.

  • Orgel, L. E., & Crick, F. H. (1980). Selfish DNA: The ultimate parasite. Nature, 284(5757), 604–607. doi: 10.1038/284604a0

  • Oxford English Dictionary. (n.d.). Code. In F. McPherson (Ed.) Oxford English dictionary online. Retrieved from http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/35578?rskey=ppAXGm&result=1#eid

  • Schrödinger, E. (1944). What is life? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • The ENCODE Project Consortium. (2007). Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1 % of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project. Nature, 447, 799–816. doi: 10.1038/nature05874

  • The International HapMap Consortium. (2003). The International HapMap Project. Nature, 426, 789-796.

  • The International HapMap Consortium. (2004). Integrating ethics and science in the International HapMap Project. Nature Reviews Genetics, 5, 467–475. doi:10.1038/nrg1351

  • Weinberg, R. A. (1991). The human genome initiative. There are two large questions. The FASEB Journal, 5, 78.







Creative Commons License
Texts in the journal are –unless otherwise indicated– published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________