Is beauty a criterion of truth? Genetic quality or aesthetic criteria, drivers of sexual selection in animals

Juan Ignacio Pérez


Do bees or hummingbirds perceive the beauty of the flowers they approach to take nectar? That is, can non-human animals appreciate beauty? Is there a universal truth regarding beauty? Or is it just a useful attribute, an indicator of a valuable trait? As with so many other natural phenomena, there is no simple answer to these questions. In the following document, we analyse different aspects of sexual selection and its connection (or lack thereof) to aesthetic criteria and the so-called handicap principle.


sexual selection; beauty; evolutionary biology; evolution



Brown, S. (2022). Naturalizing aesthetics. In A. Chatterjee & E. R. Cardillo (2022), Brain, beauty, & art: Essays bringing neuroaesthetics into focus (pp. 18–21). Oxford University Press.

Buskes, C. (2006). Evolutionair denken: de invloed van Darwin op ons wereldbeeld. Uitgeverij Nieuwezijds.

Chatterjee, A., & Cardillo, E. R. (2022). Prologue: Where have we been, and where are we now? In A. Chatterjee & E. R. Cardillo, Brain, beauty, & art: Essays bringing neuroaesthetics into focus (pp. XI–XII). Oxford University Press.

Darwin, C. (1860, 3 April). Letter to Asa Gray. Darwin Correspondence Project.

Darwin, C. (1877). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. John Murray.

DeAngelis, R. S., & Hofmann, H. A. (2020). Neural and molecular mechanisms underlying female mate choice decisions in vertebrates. Journal of Experimental Biology, 223(17), jeb207324.

Deutsch, D. (2011). The beginning of infinity. Explanations that transform the world. Viking.

Hoke, K. L., Burmeister, S. S., Fernald, R. D., Rand, A. S., Ryan, M. J., & Wilczynski, W. (2004). Functional mapping of the auditory midbrain during mate call reception. Journal of Neuroscience, 24(50), 11264–11272.

Kandel, E. R. (2016). Reductionism in art and brain science. Bridging the two cultures. Columbia University Press.

Keagy, J., Savard, J.-F., & Borgia, G. (2009). Male satin bowerbird problem-solving ability predicts mating success. Animal Behaviour, 78(4), 809–817.

Keagy, J., Savard, J.-F., & Borgia, G. (2011). Complex relationship between multiple measures of cognitive ability and male mating success in satin bowerbirds, Ptilonorhynchus violaceus. Animal Behaviour, 81, 1063–1070.

Li, Q., Gao, K.-Q., Vinther, J., Shawkey, M. D., Clarke, J. A., D’Alba, L., Meng, Q., Briggs, D. E., & Prum, R. O. (2010). Plumage color patterns of an extinct dinosaur. Science, 327(5971), 1369–1372.

Moreno, J. (2013). Evolución por selección sexual según Darwin. La vigencia de una idea. Síntesis.

Nadal, M., & Cela-Conde, C. J. (2022). Bringing it all together. Neurological and neuroimaging evidence of the neural underpinnings of visual aesthetics. In A. Chatterjee & E. R. Cardillo, Brain, beauty, & art: Essays bringing neuroaesthetics into focus (pp. 8–11). Oxford University Press.

Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review, 83(4), 435–450.

Osuna, A. J. (2017, 17 September). Antropomorfismo [conference session]. Naukas, Bilbao.

Prokop, Z. M., Michalczyk, L., Drobniak, S. M., Herdegen, M., & Radwan, J. (2012). Meta-analysis suggests choosy females get sexy sons more than «good genes». Evolution, 66(9), 2665–2673.

Prum, R. O. (2012). Aesthetic evolution by mate choice: Darwin’s really dangerous idea. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 367(1600), 2253–2265.

Prum, R. O. (2017). The evolution of beauty: How Darwin’s forgotten theory of mate choice shapes the animal world – and us. Anchor.

Rosenthal, G. G., & Ryan M. J. (2022). Sexual selection and the ascent of women: Mate choice research since Darwin. Science, 375(6578), eabi6308.

Ryan, M. J. (2018). A taste for the beautiful. Princeton University Press.

Sainani, K. (2015). Q&A: David Deutsch. Nature526, S16.

Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection – a selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53, 205–214.


  • There are currently no refbacks.