DOI: https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.12.20508

Climate change is not equal to all: The contribution of feminist studies to climate change research


Abstract


The impacts of climate change on people are not homogeneous, with some social groups being more heavily affected than others. This is due to the existence of a differential and contextual vulnerability that most often is related to inequality. In this sense, gender is a key axis of social inequality that intersects with other systems of power and marginalization to cause unequal experiences of climate change vulnerability and adaptive capacity. Thus, a gender analysis in climate change research examines structures and relationships of power. In this article, I provide some examples of differential impacts of climate change and how feminist studies make visible the underlying causes of vulnerability as well as the agency of marginalised actors to propose alternatives.


Keywords


climate change adaptation; maladaptation; feminist research; intersectionality; contextual vulnerability.

References


Andersson, E., & Gabrielsson, S. (2012). ‘Because of poverty, we had to come together’: Collective action for improved food security in rural Kenya and Uganda. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 10(3), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2012.666029

Arora-Jonsson, S. (2011). Virtue and vulnerability: Discourses on women, gender and climate change. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 744–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.005

Atteridge, A., & Remling, E. (2017). Is adaptation reducing vulnerability or redistributing it? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 9(1), e500. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.500

Benjaminsen, G., & Kaarhus, R. (2018). Commodification of forest carbon: REDD+ and socially embedded forest practices in Zanzibar. Geoforum, 93, 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.04.021

Bradshaw, S., & Linneker, B. (2009). Gender perspectives on disaster reconstruction in Nicaragua: Reconstructing roles and relations? In E. Enarson & D. P. G. Chakrabarti (Eds.), Women, gender and disaster: Global issues and initiatives (1a edición, pp. 75–88). SAGE Publications Pvt. Ltd. http://doi.org/10.4135/9788132108078.n6

Carter, T. R., Fronzek, S., Inkinen, A., Lahtinen, I., Lahtinen, M., Mela, H., O’Brien, K. L., Rosentrater, L. D., Ruuhela, R., Simonsson, L., & Terama, E. (2014). Characterising vulnerability of the elderly to climate change in the Nordic region. Regional Environmental Change, 16(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0688-7

Carvalho, L. M. D., & Bógus, C. M. (2020). Gender and social justice in urban agriculture: The network of agroecological and peripheral female urban farmers from São Paulo. Social Sciences9(8), 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9080127

Djoudi, H., & Brockhaus, M. (2011). Is adaptation to climate change gender neutral? Lessons from communities dependent on livestock and forests in northern Mali. International Forestry Review13(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554811797406606

Djoudi, H., Locatelli, B., Vaast, C., Asher, K., Brockhaus, M., & Basnett Sijapati, B. (2016). Beyond dichotomies: Gender and intersecting inequalities in climate change studies. Ambio45(S3), 248–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0825-2

Eriksen, S. H., Nightingale, A. J., & Eakin, H. (2015). Reframing adaptation: The political nature of climate change adaptation. Global Environmental Change35, 523–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.014

Gay-Antaki, M. (2016). “Now We Have Equality”: A feminist political ecology analysis of carbon markets in Oaxaca, Mexico. Journal of Latin American Geography15(3), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1353/lag.2016.0030

Laska, S., & Morrow, B. H. (2006). Social vulnerabilities and hurricane Katrina: An unnatural disaster in New Orleans. Marine Technology Society Journal40(4), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.4031/002533206787353123

Mustafa, D., & Wrathall, D. (2011). Indus basin floods of 2010: Souring of a Faustian bargain? Water Alternatives, 4(1), 72–85. http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/volume4/v4issue1/127-a4-1-5/file

Nightingale, A. J. (2011). Bounding difference: Intersectionality and the material production of gender, caste, class and environment in Nepal. Geoforum42(2), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.03.004

Oliver, B. (2016). “The Earth gives us so much”: Agroecology and rural women’s leadership in Uruguay. Culture, Agriculture, Food and Environment38(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/cuag.12064

Paprocki, K. (2018). Threatening dystopias: Development and adaptation regimes in Bangladesh. Annals of the American Association of Geographers108(4), 955–973. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2017.1406330

Röhr, U. (2006). Gender and climate change. Tiempo, 59, 3–7. https://www.preventionweb.net/files/9739_tiempo59low.pdf

United Nations Viet Nam & Oxfam Viet Nam. (2009). Responding to climate change in Vietnam. Opportunities for improving gender equality. http://un.org.vn/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_details&gid=110&Itemid=266&lang=en

Vincent, K. E., Tschakert, P., Barnett, J., Rivera-Ferre, M. G., & Woodward, A. (2014). Cross-chapter box on gender and climate change. In C. B. Field, V. R. Barros, D. J. Dokken, K. J. Mach, M. D. Mastrandrea, T. E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K. L. Ebi, Y. O. Estrada, R. C. Genova, B. Girma, E. S. Kissel, A. N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P. R. Mastrandrea, & L. L. White (Eds.), Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 105–107). Cambridge University Press.

Wekesah, F. M., Mutua, E. N., & Izugbara, C. O. (2019). Gender and conservation agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability17(1), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2019.1567245

Westholm, L. (2016). Fruits from the forest and the fields: Forest conservation policies and intersecting social inequalities in Burkina Faso’s REDD+ program. International Forestry Review18(4), 511–521. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554816820127578


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.





Creative Commons License
Texts in the journal are –unless otherwise indicated– published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________