From nuclear desert to evolutionary lab: The response of living organisms to Chernobyl’s ionising radiation


The 1986 accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in Ukraine caused the worst human-caused release of radioactive material in history. Initial forecasts considered that the area affected by radioactive contamination would be devoid of life for millennia. Three decades later, the biodiversity of the area has completely recovered and all the large mammals of Eastern Europe, as well as over 200 bird species, now live in Chernobyl. The mechanisms that allow organisms to live in this area are still the subject of study and controversy. There is currently no scientific consensus on the medium- and long-term impact of radiation on the nature of the area. Thus, basic research is required in Chernobyl to understand the effects that radioactive contamination had on biodiversity there. The area is also an excellent natural laboratory for studying eco-evolutionary processes in response to human activity.


ecology; evolution; adaptation; mutation; radioactivity; Chernobyl

Full Text:



Beresford, N. A., Scott, M., & Copplestone, D. (2019). Field effects studies in Chernobyl’s Exclusion Zone: Lessons to be learnt. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, in press (corrected proof available online). doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.01.005

Bonisoli-Alquati, A., Ostermiller, S., Beasley, D. A. E., Welch, S. M., Møller, A. P., & Mousseau, T. A. (2018). Faster development covaries with higher DNA damage in grasshoppers (Chorthippus albomarginatus) from Chernobyl. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology, 91(2), 776–787. doi: 10.1086/696005

Deryabina, T. G., Kuchmel, S. V., Nagorskaya, L. L., Hinton, T. G., Beasley, J. C., Lerebours, A., & Smith, J. T. (2015). Long-term census data reveal abundant wildlife populations at Chernobyl. Current Biology, 25(19), 824–826. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.017

Galván, I., Bonisoli-Alquati, A., Jenkinson, S., Ghanem, G., Wakamatsu, K., Mousseau, T. A., & Møller, A. P. (2014). Chronic exposure to low-dose radiation at Chernobyl favours adaptation to oxidative stress in birds. Functional Ecology, 28(6), 1387–1403. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12283

Mousseau, T. A., & Møller, A. P. (2014). Genetic and ecological studies of animals in Chernobyl and Fukushima. Journal of Heredity, 105(5), 704–709. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esu040

Møller, A. P., & Mousseau, T. A. (2006). Biological consequences of Chernobyl: 20 years on. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21(4), 200–207. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.01.008

Møller, A. P., & Mousseau, T. A. (2016). Are organisms adapting to ionizing radiation at Chernobyl? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 31(4), 281–289. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.01.005

Murphy, J. F., Nagorskaya, L. L., & Smith, J. T. (2011). Abundance and diversity of aquatic macroinvertebrate communities in lakes exposed to Chernobyl-derived ionising radiation. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 102(7), 688–694. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2011.04.007

Smith, J. (2007). Is Chernobyl radiation really causing negative individual and population-level effects on barn swallows? Biology Letters, 4(1), 63–64. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0430

UNSCEAR. (1996). Effects of radiation on the environment. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation (UNSCEAR 1996 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes). New York: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. 

Yablokov, A. V., Nesterenko, V. B., & Nesterenko, A. V. (2009). Consequences of the Chernobyl catastrophe for the environment. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1181(1), 221–286. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04830.x


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
Texts in the journal are –unless otherwise indicated– published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License