DOI: https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.9.12479

Social networks and robotic companions: Technology, ethics, and science fiction


Abstract


Information technologies have become part of our everyday lives and are increasingly acting as intermediaries in our workplaces and personal relationships or are even substituting them. This growing interaction with machines poses several questions about which we have no previous experience, nor can we reliably predict how they will influence the evolution of society. This has led to the convergence of technoscience and humanities in an ethical debate that is starting to bear fruit, not only with the creation of regulations and standards, but also with educational initiatives in university teaching, professional improvement, and the formation of public opinion. Interestingly, science fiction often plays a prominent speculative role in highlighting the pros and cons of potential scenarios.

Keywords


social networks; assistive robotics; ethics; science fiction; science and humanities

References


  1. Bearne, S. (2016, 14 September). Plan your digital afterlife and rest in cyber peace. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/media-network/2016/sep/14/plan-your-digital-afterlife-rest-in-cyber-peace

  2. Hunt, E. (2016, 24 March). Tay, Microsoft’s AI chatbot, gets a crash course in racism from Twitter. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.
    theguardian.com/technology/2016/mar/24/tay-microsofts-ai-chatbot-gets-a-crash-course-in-racism-from-twitter

  3. Lin, P., Abney, K., & Bekey, G. (2011). Robot ethics: The ethical and social implications of robotics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  4. Swain, C. (2007). Designing games to effect social change. In A. Baba (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 Digital Games Research Association Conference (pp. 805–809). Tokyo, Japan: Digital Games Research Association.

  5. Torras, C. (2008). La mutació sentimental. Lleida, Spain: Pagès Editors.

  6. Torras, C. (2016). Service robots for citizens of the future. European Review, 24(1), 17–30. doi: 10.1017/S1062798715000393 

  7. Torras, C. (2017). Enxarxats. Barcelona: Males Herbes.

  8. Torras, C. (2018). The vestigial heart. A novel of the robot age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  9. Veruggio, G., Operto, F., & Bekey, G. A. (2016). Roboethics: Social and ethical implications of robotics. In B. Siciliano, & O. Khatib (Eds.), Handbook of robotics, 2nd edition (pp. 2135–2160). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer.

  10. Von Ahn, L., & Dabbish, L. (2008). Designing games with a purpose. Communications of the ACM, 51(8), 58–67. doi: 10.1145/1378704.1378719

  11. Wu, M. (2012, 15 September). My chapter on influencers. Lithium Community. Retrieved from https://community.lithium.com/t5/Science-of-Social-Blog/My-Chapter-on-Influencers/ba-p/8213







Creative Commons License
Texts in the journal are –unless otherwise indicated– published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________