DOI: https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.9.12222

Robotics and automation for societal good: Global South challenges and technology-policy considerations


Abstract


Robotics and automation and artificial intelligence technologies hold immense potential in addressing many of the societal challenges as exemplified in the sustainable development goals of the 2030 agenda of the United Nations. They have the potential not only to increase the standard of living in developed countries, but to improve the quality of life in the so-called «Global South». This article discusses underlying challenges and technology-policy considerations when deploying emerging technologies in developing and developed economies. Various examples and implementations in collaboration with humanitarians, researchers and developers, and professional organizations across the globe are outlined.

Keywords


humanitarian robotics; unmanned aerial vehicles; environmental monitoring; technology policy; ethical, legal, and societal considerations

References


  1. Madhavan, R., Marques, L., Prestes, E., Dasgupta, P., Cabrita, G., Portugal, D., … Garcia, J. (2014). 2014 Humanitarian Robotics and Automation Technology Challenge. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 21(3), 10–16. doi: 10.1109/MRA.2014.2334953

  2. Madhavan, R., Marques, L., Prestes, E., Maffei, R., Jorge, V., Gil, B., … Dasgupta, P. (2015). 2015 Humanitarian Robotics and Automation Technology Challenge. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 22(3), 182–184. doi: 10.1109/MRA.2015.2452199

  3. Prestes, E., Marques, L., Neuland, R., Mantelli, M., Maffei, R, Dogru, S., … Madhavan, R. (2016). The 2016 Humanitarian Robotics and Automation Technology Challenge. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 23(3), 23–24. doi: 10.1109/MRA.2016.2587921

  4. Schumacher, E. F. (1973). Small is beautiful: Economics as if people mattered. London: Blond & Briggs.

  5. Silva, T., Madhavan, R., Prestes, E., Farina, F., Gandra, T., Wiebbelling, R., & Almeida, D. (2016). Unmanned aerial vehicles for environmental monitoring and disaster management. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Tech4Dev Conference, Lausanne, Switzerland. Retrieved from https://cooperation.epfl.ch/files/content/sites/cooperation/files/Tech4Dev%202016/1229-Silva-SE02-HUM_Full%20Paper.pdf 

  6. Tapia, C., Urquidi, O., & Pakleppa, M. (2018). Variable stiffness prosthetic grasper with myolelectric control, IEEE RAS-SIGHT Project. Retrieved from http://www.ieee-ras.org/images/Variable_stiffness_prosthetic_
    grasper_with_myolelectric_control.pdf

  7. Wonsick, M., Mehegan, C., & Padir, T. (2016). Enhancing the outcomes of epidemiological surveillance in Liberia through automated tracking of blood samples. Retrieved from http:// w.ieee-ras.org/images/TaskinPadir_ras-sight-finalReport-padir.pdf 







Creative Commons License
Texts in the journal are –unless otherwise indicated– published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________