Defining nature. Competing perspectives: between nativism and ecological novelty


In the 1980s, three sub-disciplines of ecology emerged – restoration ecology, conservation biology, and invasion biology – and all three embraced the nativism paradigm. By the early 2000s, historians, sociologists, and philosophers interested in the development of science began to examine the growing field of invasion biology and usually were critical of it. In the past few years, a new perspective has been taking hold in the field of ecology. Referred to as ecological novelty it emphasizes that many factors are producing ecologically novel environments. A much more simply descriptive concept, it is currently competing with the nativism paradigm to define nature. Whether the nativism or ecological novelty paradigm emerges as the dominant perspective going forward will determine how nature and biodiversity are managed.


nativism; ecological novelty; nature; nonnative species; invasion biology

Full Text:



  • Bernhard, H., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2006). Parochial altruism in humans. Nature, 442, 912–915. doi: 10.1038/nature04981

  • Boym, S. (2001). The future of nostalgia. New York: Basic Books.

  • Chew, M. K., & Laubichler, M. D. (2003). Natural enemies: Metaphor or misconception? Science, 301(5629), 52–53. doi: 10.1126/science.1085274

  • Choi, J.-K., & Bowles, S. (2007). The coevolution of parochial altruism and war. Science, 318, 636–640. doi: 10.1126/science.1144237

  • Cronon, W. (1996). Uncommon ground: Rethinking the human place in nature. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.

  • Davis, M. A., Chew, M. K., Hobbs, R. J., Lugo, A. E., Ewel, J. J., Vermeij, G. J., … Briggs, J. C. (2011). Don’t judge species on their origins. Nature, 474, 153–154. doi: 10.1038/474153a

  • Del Tredici, P. (2010). Wild urban plants of the Northeast. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  • Forman, R. T. T. (2014). Urban ecology: Science of cities. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Gould, S. J. (1998). An evolutionary perspective on strengths, fallacies, and confusions in the concept of native plants. Arnoldia, 58, 2–10.

  • Hobbs, R. J., Arico, S., Aronson, J., Baron, J. S., Bridgewater, P., Cramer, V. A., … Zobel, M. (2006). Novel ecosystems: Theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 15(1), 1–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-822X.2006.00212.x

  • Larson, B. M. H. (2005). The war of the roses: Demilitarizing invasion biology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 3(9), 495–500. doi: 10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0495:TWOTRD]2.0.CO;2

  • Murcia, C., Aronson, J., Kattan, G. H., Moreno-Mateos, D., Dixon, K., & Simberloff, D. (2014). A critique of the ‘novel ecosystem’ concept. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 29(10), 548–553. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.07.006

  • Pollan, M. (1994, 15 May). Against nativism. The New York Times Magazine. Retrieved from

  • Sagoff, M. (1999). What’s wrong with alien species? Report of the Institute for Philososphy and Public Policy. Maryland: University of Maryland, College Park.

  • Soulé, M. E. (1990). The onslaught of alien species, and other challenges in the coming decades. Conservation Biology, 4, 233–240. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00283.x

  • Temple, S. A. (1990). The nasty necessity: Eradicating exotics. Conservation Biology, 4, 113–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00096.x

  • Wilcove, D. S., Rothstein, D., Dubow, J., Phillips, A., & Losos, E. (1998). Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience, 48(8), 607–615. doi: 10.2307/1313420

  • WWF. (2014). Living Planet Report 2014: Species and spaces, people and places. Gland: WWF.

Creative Commons License
Texts in the journal are –unless otherwise indicated– published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License