Innovation in how to assess group work to motivate students' attention


In the new educational scenario of the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) becomes very relevant learning students while developing skills that help them in their future professional practice. These skills include the ability for teamwork and the ability to present the results of that work in a clear, concise and rigorous way. Therefore the teacher should encourage students to take this activity with sufficient motivation and encouraging the dedication of it.

Traditionally, the exhibition of these works only to interested members of the group while his companions saw this activity passively if not inappropriate given the burden of work that accumulate in different subjects.

Thus arises the need for the whole class effort is harnessed to better learning by students of both the content and the way to expose their peers. This is to be done through the assessment.


cooperative work, formative assessment, presentation of assignments in class


  • Bailey, J.E. y Ollis, D.F. (1986). Biochemical Engineering Fundamentals. McGraw-Hill Co., New York

  • Bain, Ken (2006). Lo que hacen los mejores profesores de Universidad. Valencia: Universitat de València. Harvard University Press: What the Best College Teachers Do, 2004

  • Biggs, John B. (2005). Calidad del aprendizaje universitario. Madrid: Editorial Narcea.

  • Bloom, Benjamin S., Madaus, George F. and Hastings, J. Thomas (1981). Evaluation to Improve Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill

  • Burdett, J. (2003). Making Groups Work: University Students' Perceptions. International Education Journal, número 4(3), pp. 170-191

  • Coll, C., Martín, E. y Onrubia, J. (2001). La evaluación del aprendizaje escolar: dimensiones psicológicas, pedagógicas y sociales. En C. Coll, J. Palacios y A. Marchesi (Coords.), Desarrollo psicológico y educación. 2. Psicología de la educación escolar. Madrid: Alianza

  • Cross, K. P. and Angelo, T. A. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A Handbook for faculty. 2nd edit. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass (1st edit.: Ann Arbor: National Center for Research to Improve Post-secondary Teaching and Learning, University of Michigan).

  • Díaz, M. (2012). Ingeniería de bioprocesos. Paraninfo, Madrid

  • Ebel, Robert L. and Frisbie, David A. (1991). Essentials of Educational Measurement, 5th Edit.. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall

  • Escudero, Tomás (2010). Sin tópicos ni malentendidos: fundamentos y pautas para una práctica evaluadora de calidad en la enseñanza universitaria. Instituto de Ciencias de la Educación, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza

  • Gros, Begoña y Romañá, Teresa (2004). Ser Profesor. Palabras sobre la docencia universitaria. Universitat de Barcelona. Institut de Ciéncies de l´Educació. Barcelona: Ediciones Octaedro.

  • Meyers, Chet (1987). Teaching Students to Think Critically. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

  • Morales Vallejo, P. (2009). La evaluación formativa. Ser profesor: una mirada al alumno. Guatemala: Universidad Rafael Landívar, pp. 41-98

  • Prieto Navarro, Leonor (Coord.) (2008). La enseñanza centrada en el aprendizaje: estrategias útiles para el profesorado. Barcelona: Ediciones Octaedro


  • There are currently no refbacks.

The texts published in this journal, unless otherwise indicated, are subject to a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivativeWorks 3.0.Spain licence. They may be copied, distributed and broadcast provided that the author and the journal that publishes them, @tic. revista d'innovació educativa, are cited. Commercial use and derivative works are not permitted. The full licence can be consulted on Creative Commons

Editor: Servei de Formació Permanent i Innovació Educativa. Tel. 0034 961625030 | Fax. 0034 961625032 | Valencia. España

ISSN: 1989-3477 |  Depósito Legal: V5051-2008


Indexed in:


Consortial Journals