Outdoor academic debate as a tool to stimulate critical thinking and scientific orientation: a pilot experience


This paper aims to present a pilot experience conducted during the spring of 2018 in the Jardí Botànic (Botanic Garden) of the Universitat de València. The experience brought about 24 students from the degrees of Sociology, Primary School Education and Psychology in the same university (6 students from each degree), and 6 students from different academic backgrounds, including Master´s Degree students and one PhD student. The main goal of the pilot study is to analyze the perception and effectiveness of an academic debate seminar made outdoors and including students from different academic backgrounds. It was organized in three sessions of three hours each, with a pre-established distribution of roles between moderators and participants was pre-established. Clear rules of the functioning were also set up. The debate was structured in different parts, the duration of which had been previously established, as well as the time allocated to each intervention. Mutual trust and respect were also promoted and different dialectical positions and arguments were encouraged. At the end the students assessed the experience and had the opportunity to explain the extent to which the experience was fruitful in an individual essay, highlighting especially two positive aspects: the outdoor environment and the possibility to interact with students of other careers.


debate; learning tool; critical thinking; interdisciplinarity; innovative and outdoor education


Alén, E., Domínguez, T. and de Carlos, P. (2015). University students׳ perceptions of the use of academic debates as a teaching methodology, Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 16, 15-21.

Behrendt, M. and Franklin, T. (2014). A review of research on school field trips and their value in education. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 9, 235–245.

Bellon, J. (2000). A Research-Based Justification for Debate Across the Curriculum, Argumentation and Advocacy, 36(3), 161-175.

Berman, D. S. and Davis-Berman, J. (2005). Positive psychology and outdoor education, Journal of Experiential Education, 28(1), 17-24.

Budesheim, T. and Lundquist, A. (2000). Consider the opposite: opening minds through in-class debates on course-related controversies. Teaching of Psychology, 6, 106-110.

Blanco, R. (2013). Debate como técnica de evaluación del desempeño en educación superior. Available from:

Camp, J.M. and Schnader, A.L. (2010). Using Debate to Enhance Critical Thinking in the Accounting Classroom: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and U.S. Tax Policy. Issues in Accounting Education, 25, 655-675.

Combs, H. W. and Bourne, S. G. (1994). The Renaissance of Educational Debate: Results of a Five-Year Study of the Use of Debate in Business Education, Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 5(1), 57-67.

Department of Education and Skills (2006). Learning outside the Classroom Manifesto. London: DfES.

Glackin, M. (2016). ‘Risky fun’ or ‘Authentic science’? How teachers’ beliefs influence their practice during a professional development programme on outdoor learning, International Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 409-433,

Glackin, M. (2017). ‘Control must be maintained’: exploring teachers’ pedagogical practice outside the classroom, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 39 (1).

Kennedy, R.R. (2009). The power of in-class debates, Active Learning in Higher Education, 10, 225-236.

Lampe, C., Zube, P., Lee, J., Park, C. H., and Johnston, E. (2014). Crowdsourcing civility: A natural experiment examining the effects of distributed moderation in online forums. Government Information Quarterly, 31(2), 317-326.

Lawrence, W. K. (2015). Learning and Personality: The Experience of Introverted Reflective Learners in a World of Extroverts. Cambridge Scholars Publishing

Lukianoff, G. and Haidt, J. (2018). The Coddling of the American Mind: How Good Intentions and Bad Ideas Are Setting Up a Generation for Failure. Penguin Press, USA: New York.

Lugg, A. (2007). Developing sustainability-literate citizens through outdoor learning: possibilities for outdoor education in Higher Education, Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 7(2), 97-112.

Omelicheva, M. Y. (2007). Resolved: Academic Debate Should Be a Part of Political Science Curricula, Journal of Political Science Education, 3(2), 161-175.

Pirie, M. (2006). How to Win Every Argument: The Use and Abuse of Logic. Bloomsbury, UK: London.

Rickinson, M., J. Dillon, K. Teamey, M. Morris, M. Y. Choi, D. Sanders and Benefield, P. (2004). A Review of Research on Outdoor Learning. Shrewsbury: Field Studies Council.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2004). Text and context of parliamentary debates. Cross-cultural perspectives on parliamentary discourse, 339, 216-17.

Vo, H.X. and Morris, R.L. (2006). Debate as a Tool in Teaching Economics: Rationale, Technique, and Some Evidence, Journal of Education for Business, 81(6), 315-320.

Wattchow, B. and Brown, M. (2011). A pedagogy of place: Outdoor education for a changing world. Monash University Publishing.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

The texts published in this journal, unless otherwise indicated, are subject to a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivativeWorks 3.0.Spain licence. They may be copied, distributed and broadcast provided that the author and the journal that publishes them, @tic. revista d'innovació educativa, are cited. Commercial use and derivative works are not permitted. The full licence can be consulted on Creative Commons

Editor: Servei de Formació Permanent i Innovació Educativa. Tel. 0034 961625030 | Fax. 0034 961625032 | Valencia. España

ISSN: 1989-3477 |  Depósito Legal: V5051-2008


Indexed in:


Consortial Journals