TaskTimeTracker: A tool for temporal analysis of the problem solving process


Resumen


The analysis of the problem solving process in mathematics can shed light on the learning process. However, the analysis of this process is a difficult task that has to face the complexity and non linearity of the process itself.
In this work we present the TTT software tool aimed to facilitate the registration and graphical representation of the steps that are followed by a group of students during the resolution of a problem, together with the time extension of these steps. This tool is based upon, and extends, the representation schemes presented by Arleback(2009), and can be applied to any problem resolution process (either mathematical or not) that can be divided into phases or categories along time.

Palabras clave


Problem Solving Process;Time Activity Diagram;Software Tools

Texto completo:

PDF

Referencias


  • Albarracın, L., Arleback, J., Civil, E., & Gorgorio, N. (2019). Extending modelling activity diagrams as a tool to characterise

  • mathematical modelling processes. The Mathematics

  • Enthusiast, 16(1), 211–230.

  • Arleback, J. B. (2009). On the use of realistic fermi problems

  • in introducing mathematical modelling in upper

  • secondary mathematics. The Mathematics Enthusiast,

  • (3).

  • Berry, J., & Sahlberg, P. (2006). Accountability affects the use

  • of small group learning in school mathematics. Nordic

  • Studies in Mathematics Education, 11(1), 5–31.

  • Borromeo Ferri, R. (2006). Theoretical and empirical differentiations of phases in the modelling process. ZDM,

  • (2), 86–95.

  • Brandell, J. R. (2010). Theory & practice in clinical social

  • work. Sage.

  • Bransford, J. D., & Stein, B. S. (1984). The ideal problem

  • solver. a guide for improving thinking, learning, and

  • creativity. Freeman.

  • Brown, J. P. (2003). An insight into student understanding of

  • functions in a graphing calculator environment [Master’s

  • thesis]. Department of Education, The University

  • of Melbourne.

  • Gillies, R. M. (2003). Structuring cooperative group work

  • in classrooms. International Journal of Educational

  • Research, 39(1), 35 - 49.

  • Goos, M., & Galbraith, P. (1996). Do it this way! metacognitive

  • strategies in collaborative mathematical problem

  • solving. Educational studies in mathematics, 30(3),

  • –260.

  • Pearl, J. (1984). Heuristics: intelligent search strategies for

  • computer problem solving. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.,

  • Inc., Reading, MA.

  • Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it; a new aspect of mathematical

  • method. US: Princeton University Press.

  • Puig Espinosa, L. (1996). Elementos de resoluci´on problemas.

  • Comares.

  • Reas, C., & Fry, B. (2007). Processing: A programming

  • handbook for visual designers and artists. MIT Press.

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving.

  • Academic Press: Orlando, FL.

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). On paradigms and methods: What

  • do you do when the ones you know don’t do what

  • you want them to? issues in the analysis of data in

  • the form of videotapes. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 179-214. doi: Versi´on 0.1, August 27,

  • 1207/s15327809jls0202_3

  • Scott, N., & Stacey, K. (2000). Orientation to deep structure

  • when trying examples: a key to successful problem

  • solving. Hergue.

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development

  • of higher psychological processes. Harvard university

  • press.

  • Wilson, J. W., Fernandez, M. L., & Hadaway, N. (1993).

  • Mathematical problem solving. Research ideas for the

  • classroom: High school mathematics, 57, 78.


Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.


Copyright (c) 2020 Investigación en Entornos Tecnológicos en Educación Matemática