Enhancing local development through trans-regional cooperation: Lessons from long-term practice of the LEADER concept


Resumen


Resumen: Durante mucho tiempo se consideró que el desarrollo local combinaba múltiples esfuerzos para fortalecer las zonas desfavorecidas o remotas, con riesgo de periferización o incluso de marginación. A partir de los años ochenta, la concienciación sobre el potencial endógeno y los servicios rurales permitió centrarse más en la capacidad de acción y cambio local específico de cada territorio. Este cambio en la política regional promovió el apoyo a los territorios rurales, centrándose especialmente en zonas de geografía específica, como montañas, islas y otros lugares “desfavorecidos”. Calificado como “desarrollo regional endógeno”, este planteamiento queda plasmado en el principal programa de desarrollo local de la UE, el programa LEADER, disponible desde 1991. Aunque se centró en establecer incentivos para el desarrollo en contextos rurales, el rendimiento de las regiones rurales, sin embargo, se estancó desde entonces. Este documento concibe el proceso de desarrollo local y la influencia de la cooperación transregional como los motores decisivos e interrelacionados de todo el proceso. Los efectos limitados podrían estar relacionados con la dependencia del camino, el bloqueo institucional y el escaso reconocimiento y énfasis en el papel crucial de la innovación social, lo que ahoga la necesaria adaptación de las políticas. Sin embargo, la orientación hacia la combinación de la experiencia y la contribución de los sistemas de conocimiento externos, con la singularidad y los activos locales, son aspectos que podrían contribuir de manera decisiva a los incentivos y cambios sociales tan deseados.


 


Palabras clave: Desarrollo rural, LEADER, innovación social, cooperación transnacional, desarrollo local dirigido por la comunidad.


 


Abstract: For long, local development was seen as combining multiple efforts for strengthening areas that were either disadvantaged or remote, at-risk of peripheralization or even of marginalization. Since the 1980s an emerging awareness of endogenous potential and rural amenities enabled a stronger focus on the area-specific capability for local action and change. This shift in regional policy instigated support for remote places, focusing particularly on areas of specific geographies, like mountains, islands and other places of “disadvantage”. Referred to as “endogenous regional development” that approach is epitomized by the main local development scheme of the EU, the LEADER programme which was available since 1991. While it focused on setting development incentives in rural contexts, the performance of rural regions, nevertheless, stagnated since then. This paper conceives the local development process and the influence by trans-regional cooperation as the decisive, inter-related drivers. Limited effects might be linked to path dependency, institutional lock-in and little recognition and emphasis on the crucial role of social innovation, stifling required policy adaptation. Yet, particularly the orientation on combining the experience and contribution of external knowledge systems with uniqueness and local assets might contribute decisively to the long-desired incentives and social changes.


 


Key words: Rural development, LEADER, social innovation, trans-national cooperation, community-led local development.


Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referencias


Asamer-Handler, M., Fischer, M., Lukesch, R., et al. (2014). Ausmaß und Wirkung von Beteiligungsprozessen in Lokalen Aktionsgruppen (LAG) 2007-2013: Final report. ÖAR.

 

Beer, A., McKenzie, F., Blažek, J., Sotarauta, M., and Ayres, S. (2020). Every place matters: towards effective place-based policy. Regional Studies Policy Impact Books, Vol. 2 No.1. Regional Studies Association. Taylor&Francis.

 

Bock, B. (2012). Social innovation and sustainability; how to disentangle the buzzword and its application in the field of agriculture and rural development. Studies in Agricultural Economics, (114), 57-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.7896/j.1209

 

Bryden, J.M. (2010). Local Development. Chapter 23. In K. Hart, J. L. Laville, and D. Cattani (eds.), The Human Economy, A Citizen’s Guide, (pp. 248-260). Polity Press.

 

Cejudo, E., and Navarro, F. (eds.). (2020). Neoendogenous Development in European Rural Areas. Springer Geography. Springer.

 

Celata, F., and Coletti, R. (2015). Place-based strategies or territorial cooperation? Regional development in transnational perspective in Italy. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 29(4-5), 394-411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094214533903

 

Champetier, Y. (2017). LEADER Back to the future. 25 years of LEADER. AEIDL, Brussels. Retrieved from: https://www.aeidl.eu/images/stories/pdf/leaderyves-en.pdf (26/05/2021).

 

Copus, A. K., and De Lima, P. (eds.). (2015). Territorial Cohesion in Rural Europe. The Relational Turn in Rural Development. Regions and Cities 76. Routledge.

 

Copus, A., Kahila, P., Dax, T., Kovács, K., Tagai, G., Weber, R., Grunfelder, J., Meredith, D., Ortega-Reig, M., Piras, S., Löfving, L., Moodie, J., Fritsch, M., and Ferrandis, A. (2021). European shrinking rural areas: Key messages for a refreshed long-term vision. TERRA Revista de Desarollo Local (this volume). 

 

Costanza, R., and Daly, H. E. (1992). Natural Capital and Sustainable Development. Conservation Biology, 6(1), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.610037.x

 

Da Rosa Pires, A., Pertoldi, M., Edwards, J., and Hegyi, F. B. (2014). Smart specialisation and innovation in rural areas, JRC Technical Reports, S3 Policy Brief Series No., 09/2014. Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC90000/jrc90000_policy%20brief_n_092014%20(2).pdf (26/05/2021).

 

Dargan, L., and Shucksmith, M. (2008). LEADER and Innovation. Sociologia Ruralis, 48(3), 274-291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00463.x

 

Dax, T. (2015). Why are Local Initiatives So Important in Mountain Regions? Mountain Views, Chronicles of the Consortium for Integrated Climate Research in Western Mountains. CIRMOUNT, 9(2), 44-46. Retrieved from: http://www.fs.fed.us/psw/cirmount/publications/pdf/Mtn_Views_dec_15.pdf 

 

Dax, T. (2019). Development of mountainous regions: smart specialization approaches as a means to overcoming peripheralization. In I. Kristensen, A. Dubois, and J. Teräs (eds.), Strategic Approaches to Regional Development, Smart Experimentation in Less-Favoured Regions, (pp.52-67). Series Regions and Cities. Routledge.

 

Dax, T., and Copus, A. (2020). Final Report – Annex 13 How to achieve a transformation framework for Shrinking Rural Regions. European Shrinking Rural Areas: Challenges, Actions and Perspectives for Territorial Governance, ESPON 2020 project ESCAPE. Version 13/10/2020. ESPON EGTC. Retrieved from: https://www.espon.eu/sites/default/files/attachments/ESPON%20ESCAPE%20Final%20Report%20Annex%2013%20-%20Transformation%20Framework.pdf (26/05/2021).

 

Dax, T., and Kah, S. (2017). Transnational Cooperation – an Opportunity for Social Innovation of Rural Regions. Special Issue on Territorial Cooperation. European Structural and Investment Funds Journal, (EStIF) 5(3), 211-222. Retrieved from: https://estif.lexxion.eu/article/ESTIF/2017/3/6

 

Dax, T., and Oedl-Wieser, T. (2016). Rural innovation activities as a means for changing development perspectives – An assessment of more than two decades of promoting LEADER initiatives across the European Union. Studies in Agricultural Economics 118(1), 30-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.7896/j.1535  

 

Dax, T., Oedl-Wieser, T., and Strahl-Naderer, W. (2014). Altering the Evaluation Design for Rural Policies. European Structural and Investment Funds Journal (EStIF), 2(2), 141-152. Retrieved from: https://estif.lexxion.eu/article/estif/2014/2/10

 

Dax, T., Strahl, W., Kirwan, J., and Maye, D. (2016). The Leader programme 2007-2013: Enabling or disabling social innovation and neo-endogenous development? Insights from Austria and Ireland. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(1), 56-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776413490425

 

De Toni, A., Di Martino, P., and Dax, T. (2020). Location matters. Are science and policy arenas facing the Inner Peripheries challenges in EU? Land Use Policy 100, 105111. Published online 2 October 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105111.

 

Donald, B., and Gray, M. (2019). The double crisis: in what sense a regional problem? Regional Studies, 53(2), 297-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1490014

 

Esparcia, J. (2014). Innovative and networks in rural areas. An analysis from European innovative projects. Journal of Rural Studies, (34), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.12.004

 

European Commission - EC (2006). The LEADER approach: a basic guide. Brussels. Retrieved from: https://enrd.ec.europa.eu/sites/enrd/files/2B953E0A-9045-2198-8B09-ED2F3D2CCED3.pdf (26/05/2021).

 

European Network for Rural Development - ENRD (2011). LEADER Transnational Cooperation Guid. Brussels.

 

European Network for Rural Development - ENRD (2018). LEADER LAG Survey 2017, Findings at European Level. Brussels. Retrieved from: https://enrd.ec.europa.eu/sites/enrd/files/leader-resources_lag_survey_results.pdf (26/05/2021).

 

Fidlschuster, L, Dax, T.. and Oedl-Wieser, T. (2016). Demografischer Wandel, Diversität und Entwicklungsfähigkeit ländlicher Regionen. In R. Egger, and A. Posch (eds.), Lebensentwürfe im ländlichen Raum, (pp. 7-16). Springer Fachmedien.

 

Fortunato, A., and Zumpano, C. (eds.) (2015). Co-operation between rural areas: Leader and extra-Leader projects of Italian LAGs, Rete Rurale Nazionale 2007-2013, Roma.

 

Granberg, L., Andersson, K., and Kovách I. (eds.) (2014). Evaluating the European Approach to Rural Development, Grass-roots Experiences of the LEADER Programme. Perspectives on Rural Policy and Planning. Ashgate.

 

Green, D. (2016). How change happens. Oxfam and Oxford University Press: Oxford. Retrieved from: https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/a2d96f5a-5189-4cf8-a876-d44eda71545f/618650.pdf (26/05/2021).

 

Harrison, J., Delgado, M., Derudder, B., Anguelovski, I., Montero, S., Bailey, D., and De Propris, L. (2020). Pushing regional studies beyond its borders. Regional Studies, 54(1), 129-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1672146.

 

Kasabov, E. (ed.). (2014). Rural Cooperation in Europe, in Search of the “Relational Rurals”. Palgrave Macmillan.

 

Katona-Kovács, J., High, H.n and Nemes, G. (2011). Importance of Animation Actions in the Operation of Hungarian Local Action Groups. European Countryside, 3(4), 227-240. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10091-012-0006-7

 

Kull, M. (2014). European Integration and Rural Development. Ashgate.

 

Labianca, M., De Rubertis, S., Belliggiano, A., Salento, A., and Navarro, F. (2020). Social innovation, territorial capital and LEADER experiences in Andalusia (Spain) and in Molise (Italy). In E. Cejudo, and F. Navarro (eds.), Neoendogenous development in European rural areas. Results and lessons, (pp. 111-132). Springer Edit.

 

LEADER Inspired Network Community - LINC (2021). LINC conference 2021, 14-17 September, LAG Šumperský venkov, Czech Republic. Retrieved from: https://www.linc2021.eu/(26/05/2021).

 

Lowe, P., Phillipson, J., Proctor, A., and Gkartzios, M. (2019). Expertise in rural development: A conceptual and empirical analysis. World Development, (116), 28-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.12.005

 

Lukesch, R. (2018). LEADER Reloaded. Keynote paper at the ELARD conference, 26-28th September, Evora (PT). Retrieved from: https://leaderconference.minhaterra.pt/ (26/05/2021).

 

Lukesch, R., Bontron, J. C., Ricci, C., and Tödtling-Schönhofer, H. (2004). Methods for and Success of Mainstreaming Leader Innovations and approach into Rural Development Programmes. Final Report. ÖIR-Managementdienste GmbH. 

 

Lukesch, R., Fidlschuster, L., Fischer, M., Said, N., Ecker, B., Gassler, H., Mair, S., and Philipp, S. (2019). Analyse der Potenziale Sozialer Innovation im Rahmen von LEADER 2014-20 (SILEA), Endbericht. ÖAR and ZSI. Retrieved from: https://www.oear.at/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Endbericht_SILEA_04_2019.pdf (26/05/2021).

 

Martin, R., Sunley, P., and Tyler, P. (2015). Local growth evolutions: recession, resilience and recovery. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, (8), 141-148. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsv012

 

Midmore, P., Partridge, M. D., Olfert, M. R., and Ali, K. (2010). The Evaluation of Rural Development Policy: Macro and Micro Perspectives. Eurochoices, 9(1), 24-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-692X.2010.00155.x

 

Moulaert, F., and MacCallum, D. (2019). Advanced Introduction to Social Innovation.  Edward Elgar Publishing.

 

Navarro, F. A., Woods, M., and Cejudo, E. (2015). The LEADER Initiative has been a Victim of Its Own Success. The Decline of the Bottom-Up Approach in Rural Development Programmes. The Cases of Wales and Andalusia. Sociologia Ruralis, 56(2), 270-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/soru.12079

 

Navarro, F., Labianca, M., Cejudo, E., De Rubertis, S., Salento, A., Maroto, J. C. and Belliggiano, A. (2018). Interpretations of innovation in rural development, social innovation? The cases of LEADER projects in Lecce (Italy) and Granada (Spain) in 2007-2013 period. European Countryside, 10(1), 107-126. https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2018-000

 

Navarro-Valverde, F. A., Pylkänen, P., Hyyryläinen, T., and Cejudo-García, E. (2020). Transnational Inter-Territorial Cooperation in the LEADER Approach. The Cases of Finland and Spain. Revista De Estudios Andaluces, (39), 114-133. https://dx.doi.org/10.12795/rea.2020.i39.06

 

Neumeier, S. (2012). Why do Social Innovations in Rural Development Matter and Should They be Considered More Seriously in Rural Development Research? – Proposal for a Stronger Focus on Social Innovations in Rural Development Research. Sociologia Ruralis, 52(1), 48-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00553.x

 

OECD (ed.) (2014). Innovation and Modernising the Rural Economy, OECD publishing, Paris. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264205390-en (26/05/2021).

 

Ogilvy, S., and Costanza, R. (2015). Accounting for Ecological Capital. Ecology. DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199830060-0106 (26/05/2021).

 

Peters, R. (2013). Investing in Europe’s Future at Grassroots Level: The Role of EU Funded Community Led Local Development (CLLD). European Structural and Investment Funds Journal (EStIF) 1(1), 27-30. Retrieved from: https://estif.lexxion.eu/article/ESTIF/2013/1/4

 

Pfefferkorn, W., Leitgeb-Zach, M., and Favry, E. (2010). Kooperation in der ländlichen Entwicklung: Erfolgsfaktoren und Stolpersteine. Studie im Zusammenhang mit der Evaluierung des Leader-Schwerpunktes im Österreichischen Programm für die Entwicklung des Ländlichen Raumes 2007-2013. Rosinak und Partner.

 

Pike, A., Rodríguez-Pose, A., and Tomaney, J. (2006). Local and regional development. Routledge.

 

Pisani, E., and Burighel, L. (2014). Structures and dynamics of transnational cooperation networks: evidence based on Local Action Groups in the Veneto Region, Italy. Bio-based and Applied Economics, 3(3), 249-269. https://doi.org/10.13128/BAE-14681

 

Pylkkänen, P., Hyyryläinen, T., and Navarro, F. (2020). Transnational cooperation-the underutilized potential of the European LEADER method. In E. Cejudo, and F. Navarro (eds.), Neoendogenous development in European rural areas. Results and lessons, (pp. 133-148). Springer Edit.

 

Ray, C. (2006). Neo-endogenous rural development in the EU. In P. Cloke, T. Marsden, and P. Mooney (eds.), Handbook of Rural Studies, (pp. 278-291). Sage Publications.

 

Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Do institutions matter for regional development? Regional Studies, 47(7),  1034-1047. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.748978

 

Servillo, L., and De Bruijn, M. (2018). From LEADER to CLLD: The Adoption of the New Fund Opportunities and of Their Local Development Options. European Structural and Investment Funds Journal (EStIF), 6(3), 223-233. Retrieved from: https://estif.lexxion.eu/article/ESTIF/2018/3/5.

 

Shucksmith, M. (2018). Re-imagining the rural: From rural idyll to Good Countryside. Journal of Rural Studies, (59), 163-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.019

 

Shucksmith, M., Brooks, E., and Madanipour, A. (2020). LEADER and Spatial Justice. Sociologia Ruralis, (published online 29 December 2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12334

 

Social Innovation Community (2018). The Lisbon Declaration. Social Innovation as a Path to a Sustainable, Resilient and Inclusive Europe (H2020-project, Grant No. 69388). Retrieved from: https://ldnet.eu/wp-content/uploads/bsk-pdf-manager/Lisbon_Social_Innovation_Declaration_2018_47.pdf (26/05/2021).

 

Stöhr, W. (1984). Selective Self-Reliance and Endogenous Regional development – Preconditions and Constraints. IIR-Discussion Papers, 19. WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.

 

Torre, A., Corsi, S., Steiner, M., Wallet, F., and Westlund, H. (eds.) (2020). Smart Development for Rural Areas. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429354670

 

Visvizi, A., Lytras, M. D., and Mudri, G. (eds.) (2019). Smart Villages in the EU and Beyond (pp. 1-12). Emerald Publishing Limited. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78769-845-120191002

 

Zapf, W. (1994). Über soziale Innovationen. In W. Zapf (ed.), Modernisierung, Wohlfahrtsentwicklung und Transformation: soziologische Aufsätze 1987 bis1994, (pp. 23-40). Edition Sigma.

 

Zeuli, K. A., and Cropp, R. (2004). Cooperatives: Principles and practices in the 21st century. University of Wisconsin. Retrieved from: https://www.mcdc.coop/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Cooperatives-Principles-and-practices-in-the-21st-century.pdf (26/05/2021).


Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.


TERRA: Revista de Desarrollo Local. ISSN: 2386-9968. journal.terra@gmail.com



TERRA: Revista de Desarrollo Local. ISSN: 2386-9968. journal.terra@gmail.com