Proprietà privata, sovranità e diritto di escludere: la “disarmonia produttiva” di Kant

Roberta Picardi

doi:10.7203/REK.8.2.27527

Proprietà privata, sovranità e diritto di escludere: la “disarmonia produttiva” di Kant

Roberta Picardi

Resumen

This paper aims at shedding light on a thesis, which appears not to be fully and systematically developed in Reinhardt’s
book: the thesis that Kant stands in the way of the main streams of contemporary philosophical-political debate, insofar
as his legal-political philosophy allows for a fundamental questioning of the nexus between private property,
sovereignty and the right of exclusion. To this end, one will firstly show how Reinhardt interprets the articulation
between the three terms - land ownership, sovereignty, and the right of exclusion - by collecting the references to this
subject scattered throughout her book (§1). On the basis of this reconstruction, the essay will critically focus on two
points: on the one hand, the nexus between private land ownership and "public space" (§ 2); on the other hand, the
status of "provisional possession" in Kantian legal philosophy (§ 3).
In conclusion, one will summon up the results of the analysis in order to put forward the distinctive features of Kant’s
deduction of property rights which allows to critically rethink the triad ownership/ sovereignty and exclusion.

Palabras clave

Cosmopolitan Right, Original Acquisition, Land, Ownership, Sovereignty

Texto completo:

PDF HTML

Referencias

Abizadeh, A. (2008). Democratic Theory and Border Coercion. No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders. Political
Theory, 36 (1), 37-65.
Achenwall, G. (1755, terza edizione). Ius Naturae. Göttingen: Bossiegel.
Angeli, A. (2015). Cosmopolitanism, Self-determination and Territory: Justice with Borders. Palgrave Macmillan
Benhabib, S. (2004). The Rights of Others. Aliens, Residents and Citizens. Cambridge University Press.
Brandt, R. (1982). Das Erlaubnisgesetz, oder: Vernunft und Geschichte in Kants Rechtslehre. In Id. (Ed.), Rechtsphilosophie der
Aufklärung (pp. 233-285). De Gruyter.
Brudner, A. (2011). ‘Private Law and Kantian Right’, University of Toronto Law Journal, 61 (2), 279–311.
Byrd, S./Hruschka, J. (2010). Kant’s Doctrine of Right: A Commentary. Cambridge, University Press.
Carens, J. (1987). Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders. The Review of Politics, 49 (2), 251-273.
Cubo Ugarte, O. (2022). El origen de la desigualdad en la Doctrina del Derecho de Kant. Con-Textos Kantianos, 15, 178-198.

Huber, J. (2016). Theorising from the Global Standpoint: Kant and Grotius on Original Common Possession of the Earth. European
Journal of Philosophy, (), –. doi:10.1111/ejop.12176
Fichte, J. G. Grundlage des Naturrechts nach den Principien der Wissenschaftslehre. In GA I 3, pp. 291-460 e GA I 4, pp. 11-65.
Flikschuh, K. (2000). Kant and Modern Political Philosophy. Cambridge University Press (citato nella edizione digitale del 2004).
Flikschuh, K. (2010a). Kant’s Sovereignty Dilemma. A Contemporary Analysis. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 18 (4), 469-
493.
Flikschuh, K. (2010b). Innate Right and Acquired Right in Arthur Ripstein's Force and Freedom. Jurisprudence, 1 (2), 295-304.
Höffe, O. (1995). Kategorische Rechtsprinzipien. Ein Kontrapunkt der Moderne, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp; trad. ingl. (2002):
Categorical Principles of Law. A Counterpoint to Modernity, a cura di M. Migotti, intr. di K. Baynes. Pennsylvania University Press.
Hruschka, J. (2004). ‘The Permissive Law of Practical Reason in Kant's Metaphysics of Morals`. Law and Philosophy, 23, 45-72.
Huber, J. (2017), Theorising from the Global Standpoint. Kant and Grotius on Original Common Possession of the Earth. European
Journal of Philosophy, 25 (2), 231-249.
Kersting, W. (1992). Politics, freedom, and order: Kant’s political philosophy. In P. Guyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant
(pp. 342-366). Cambridge University Press.
Kleingeld, P. (1998). Kant’s Cosmopolitan Law. World Citizenship for a Global Order. Kantian Review, 2, 72-90.
Kleingeld, P. (2012). Kant and Cosmopolitanism. Cambridge University Press.

Ludwig, B. (1988), Kants Rechtslehre. Meiner.
Marti, U. (2012). Mein und Dein: Eigentum oder Eigenart? Überlegungen zur Begründbarkeit eines Rechts auf Exklusion. In A.
Cassee e A. Goppel (Eds.), Migration und Ethik (pp. 89-105). Mentis.
Miller, D. (2007). National Responsibility and Global Justice. Oxford University Press.
Pinheiro Walla, A. (2016). Common Possession of the Earth and Cosmopolitan Right. Kant-Studien, 107 (1), 160-178.
Ripstein, A. (2009). Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy. Harvard University Press.
Simmons, A.J. (2016). Boundaries of Authority. Oxford University Press
Stilz, A. (2009). Why do states have territorial rights?. International Theory, 1 (2), 185-213.
Stilz, A. (2014). Provisional Right and Non-State Peoples. In K. Flikschuh e L. Ypi (Eds.), Kant and Colonialism: Historical and
Critical Perspectives (pp. 197-220). Oxford University Press.
Taraborrelli, A. (2021). Kant e la migrazione. Diritti territoriali, confini e Stato cosmopolitico. Rivista di filosofia, 3, 451-474.
Ypi, L. (2014). A permissive theory of territorial rights.