DOI: https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.7.7610

From metaphor to action: Embodied language cognition


Abstract


The traditional theories that tried to explain how brain activity leads to cognition used the computer metaphor to describe the way the brain processes information codifying it into symbols that can combine following a finite set of rules. However, recent studies with updated paradigms that used neuroimaging techniques show that the brain activity registered when we observed a brain involved in some cognitive task are the same we would observe if that brain was immersed in perceptual, motor or emotional processing of the information handled for the task. In this article, we review the latest contributions to embodied cognition theories that provide a new approach to human cognition.


Keywords


symbols; embodiment; language; sensorimotor system; emotion

Full Text:

PDF

References


  1. Aboitiz, F., García, R., Bosman, C., & Brunetti, E. (2006). Cortical memory mechanisms and language origins. Brain and Language, 98, 40–56. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.01.006

  2. De Vega, M., Glenberg, A., & Graesser, A. (Eds.). (2008). Symbols and embodiment: Debates on meaning and cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.

  3. Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 558–565. doi: 10.3758/BF03196313

  4. Havas, D. A., Glenberg, A. M., Gutowski, K. A., Lucarelli, M. J., & Davidson, R. J. (2010). Cosmetic use of botulinum toxina affects processing of emotional language. Psychological Science, 21, 895–900. doi: 10.1177/0956797610374742

  5. Havas, D. A., Glenberg, A. M., & Rinck, M. (2007). Emotion simulation during language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 436–441. doi: 10.3758/BF03194085

  6. Martín-Loeches, M., Casado, P., & Sel, A. (2008). La evolución del cerebro en el género Homo: La neurobiología que nos hace diferentes. Revista de Neurología, 46, 731–741.

  7. Martín-Loeches, M., Sel, A., Casado, P., Jiménez, L., & Castellanos, L. (2009). Encouraging expressions affect the brain and alter visual attention. PLoS ONE, 4(6), e5920. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005920

  8. Pulvermüller, F. (2013). How neurons make meaning: Brain mechanisms for embodied and abstract-symbolic semantics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(9), 458–470

  9. Pulvermüller, F., & Fadiga, L. (2010). Active perception: Sensorimotor circuits as a cortical basis for language. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 351–360. doi: 10.1038/nrn2811

  10. Santana, E., & De Vega, M. (2013). An ERP study of motor compatibility effects in action language. Brain Research, 1526, 71–83. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.06.020

  11. Urrutia, M., & De Vega, M. (2011). Lenguaje y acción: Una revisión actual a las teorías corpóreas. Revista de Lingüística Teórica y Aplicada, 50(1), 39–67.







Creative Commons License
Texts in the journal are –unless otherwise indicated– published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________