From metaphor to action: Embodied language cognition

Pilar Casado


The traditional theories that tried to explain how brain activity leads to cognition used the computer metaphor to describe the way the brain processes information codifying it into symbols that can combine following a finite set of rules. However, recent studies with updated paradigms that used neuroimaging techniques show that the brain activity registered when we observed a brain involved in some cognitive task are the same we would observe if that brain was immersed in perceptual, motor or emotional processing of the information handled for the task. In this article, we review the latest contributions to embodied cognition theories that provide a new approach to human cognition.


Aboitiz, F., García, R., Bosman, C., & Brunetti, E. (2006). Cortical memory

mechanisms and language origins. Brain and Language, 98, 40–56. doi:


De Vega, M., Glenberg, A., & Graesser, A. (Eds.). (2008). Symbols and

embodiment: Debates on meaning and cognition. New York: Oxford

University Press.

Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. (2002). Grounding language in

action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 558–565. doi: 10.3758/


Havas, D. A., Glenberg, A. M., Gutowski, K. A., Lucarelli, M. J., &

Davidson, R. J. (2010). Cosmetic use of botulinum toxina affects

processing of emotional language. Psychological Science, 21, 895–900.

doi: 10.1177/0956797610374742

Havas, D. A., Glenberg, A. M., & Rinck, M. (2007). Emotion simulation

during language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14,

–441. doi: 10.3758/BF03194085

Martín-Loeches, M., Casado, P., & Sel, A. (2008). La evolución del cerebro

en el género Homo: La neurobiología que nos hace diferentes. Revista de

Neurología, 46, 731–741.

Martín-Loeches, M., Sel, A., Casado, P., Jiménez, L., & Castellanos,

L. (2009). Encouraging expressions affect the brain and alter visual

attention. PLoS ONE, 4(6), e5920. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005920

Pulvermüller, F. (2013). How neurons make meaning: Brain mechanisms

for embodied and abstract-symbolic semantics. Trends in Cognitive

Sciences, 17(9), 458–470

Pulvermüller, F., & Fadiga, L. (2010). Active perception: Sensorimotor

circuits as a cortical basis for language. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11,

–360. doi: 10.1038/nrn2811

Santana, E., & De Vega, M. (2013). An ERP study of motor compatibility

effects in action language. Brain Research, 1526, 71–83. doi: 10.1016/j.


Urrutia, M., & De Vega, M. (2011). Lenguaje y acción: Una revisión actual

a las teorías corpóreas. Revista de Lingüística Teórica y Aplicada, 50(1),


Full Text: PDF

Creative Commons License
Texts in the journal are –unless otherwise indicated– published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License