Collaboration 2.0: Prospects of popular science


Popular science finds itself in a new scenario where a shortage of information has been replaced by abundant and often freely available knowledge sources. Although often produced by amateurs, such information may be of a similar or even better quality than that produced professionally. Consequently, there is greater collaboration between professionals and amateurs, making it more difficult to distinguish between them.


copyright; popular science; amateur; professional; business model


ANDERSON, C., 2009a. Gratis: el futuro de un precio radical. Tendencias. Madrid.

ANDERSON, C., 2009b. La economía Long Tail. Empresa Activa. Madrid.

BENKLER, Y., 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press. New Haven, Conn.

FARRELL, M., 2001. Collaborative Circles: Friendship Dynamics and Creative Work. New York University Press. New York.

GILES, J., 2005. «Internet Encyclopaedias Go Head to Head». Nature, 438 (7070): 900-901. DOI: <10.1038/4389000>.

GLEICK, J., 2012. La información. Crítica. Barcelona.

GOLDACRE, B., 2013. Mala Farma. Paidós. Barcelona.

HIPPEL, E. von, 1986. «Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts». Management Science, 32(7): 791-805. DOI: <10.1287/mnsc.32.7.791>.

IOANNIDIS, J., 2005. «Why Most Published Research Findings Are False». PLoS Med, 2(8): e124. DOI:<10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124>

ROGERS, S., 2011. «Data Journalism at the Guardian: What Is It and How Do We Do It?». The Guardian, 28/7/2011. Available at:<>.

SHIRKY, C., 2012. Excedente cognitivo. Deusto. Madrid.

SUROWIECKI, J., 2005. Cien mejor que uno. Urano. Madrid.

TAPSCOT, D., 2011. «Esto no es una crisis, es un cambio histórico». La Vanguardia, 21/11/2011. Available at:<>.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
Texts in the journal are –unless otherwise indicated– published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License